But that's not excuse, thats reality and fact. You dont need SNES games, Zelda BotW and Mario Odyssey are good looking game compared to current games. Again, Mario Odyssey could have more details if they went with 30 FPS, or that RC would have less if they went with 60 fps, so you obviously have different priorities for Sony and Nintendo.

Have you played Ratchet and Clank (PS4)? The game is Smooth AF.

If the graphics would have been compromised by choosing 60fps, i think they made the right choice by keeping it 30fps and make the game look like a Pixar movie for real.

Of course, this is just my opinion! 

Yep because Knack is a game mady by Naughty Dog... LMAO

A lot of you need to take a chill pill. It's not a zero sum game, you don't need to tear down Sony to praise Nintendo and vice versa, they simply make different games with different priorities.

It's apples to oranges; as a massive open world game loaded with dynamic elements, Botw generally has to render/process more things at once than Uncharted does. Between its dense grass with individually rendered interactive blades, volumetric lighting, physics-driven particles, etc, Zelda has a lot going on, it doesn't have the luxury of spending as much rendering time on each individual asset as a linear game like Uncharted where the developers have more control over what's happening on screen at any given moment. 

Nobody didn't said its not smooth at 30 FPS, but 60FPS take big hit on hardware capbilites compared to 30 FPS and thats point.

I didn't said they were wrong because they went with 30 FPS, I just used that game like example of different approaches between Sony and Nintendo, were Sony goes for better graphic and 30 FPS, where Nintendo almost always goes for 60 FPS first and than graphics.

No need to be made by Naughty Dog, as long as they are Sony first party or Sony exclusive, they automatically are the best game ever, anyone don't play them are not consider still alive