By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Is it time to worry about Austria again?

 

Who should I vote?

ÖVP 16 12.40%
 
SPÖ 13 10.08%
 
FPÖ 39 30.23%
 
Grüne 16 12.40%
 
NEOS 3 2.33%
 
Other 4 3.10%
 
Don't vote 13 10.08%
 
Scoreboard 25 19.38%
 
Total:129
RolStoppable said:

I don't think you know how health care and unemployment benefits work. Even if we assumed the women were allowed to leave the house for these things, it would be maybe a couple of times per year.

While I don't know how it works in Austria, I damn well know how unemploment benefits work in other countries, you sure as hell don't get any if you don't at least get out 1-2 times a month.

That in itself is not sufficient for integration, but then I suggested earlier, stuff like mandatory language classes or other integration programmes! But oh no, that's pure xenophobia! We can't require anything of the people who move here, it's xenophobia! They should just have unconditional access to all velfare, otherwise it's xenophobia and racist and ignorant and naive and all the other bad words you throw at people who have a different opinion than you!



Around the Network
RolStoppable said:

You are fighting against arguments nobody made. You could simply admit that you don't like muslims and make it easier for everyone in this thread.

It isn't hard to concede that the Austrian burqa ban law is ridiculous. It isn't hard to acknowledge that it was put in place to pander to the xenophobes in Austria. But you can't stop defending it.

That's an ugly, ugly thing to say to another person! Would you say that to someone in person? I never said I disliked anybody. I have muslim friends that are really close to me! They respect that I have opinions that are different than theirs. Reading stuff like that legitimately hurts me a lot.

You have made zero effort to try to understand why someone would have a different opinion than you on the burqa matter. Instead you have called a huge part of the people of your society xenophobes or other bad words and your politicians for people who pander to xenophobes.

Thanks for ruining my evening.



RolStoppable said:

Yes, I would say that to someone in person.

I'm a little shocked by your behavior RolStoppable. I usually agree with your comments on these boards (I don't often comment myself, I mostly read), you seem like a reasonable person. You care a lot about muslim peoples rights, which I respect a lot.

There are a couple of things that I disagree with you about, like this burqa issue.

That last comment though, man! That's really not a nice thing to write to a person. I'm absolutely honest when I say that really hurt me to read. Wouldn't it be nicer if people could have an argument without throwing such a personal attack?



RolStoppable said:

I do wonder if you can look at this burqa issue as solely being about the law of the Austrian burqa ban. At virtually every opportunity you tried to extend the discussions about muslims to a much bigger scope than this topic is about, despite all of my efforts to keep things limited to the Austrian context.

If you think that I haven't been respectful enough in this thread, then you should first ask yourself if you respected the topic at hand.

I addressed the Austrian burqa issue, and espressed my thoughts on that and about the idea of burqa ban in general. I admit I might have went a little to far away from the core topic, but that's because those things are connected in my mind, there are links between the problems imo. I apologise for going too far away from the topic at hand.

I don't think that justifies a personal attack like that though.



Young ethnic Austrians are only a decade away from being a minority in their own country, and yet the OP describes his people as being xenophobic.

It's a sick Europe we live in.

Almost makes you wish the Führer had won the war.

User was moderated for this post

-Super_Boom

Last edited by Super_Boom - on 30 October 2017

Around the Network
RolStoppable said:

I am always late with these things because I care so little about politics, but it has come to my attention that there are elections in Austria this Sunday. Some people may remember my thread from last year about the presidential election:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=216193

This time a new government will be formed and things are pointing towards a coalition between ÖVP and FPÖ. The ÖVP is pretty much the Austrian equivalent of Merkel's CDU in Germany while the FPÖ's German equivalent is the AfD. These two parties have run the government before (only once, I think), but otherwise it has been a coalition between ÖVP and SPÖ with the only difference being who of the two had the higher share of votes and more say in the government. SPÖ is on a downward spiral though, plus ÖVP has been moving more to the right lately, so despite ÖVP + SPÖ probably still being possible, the ÖVP is much more likely to choose the FPÖ as their partner. At least that's what I've picked up from the little news that I paid attention to.

Here are a bunch of surveys from September that were conducted for major newspapers to give you an idea about the power levels of each political party in Austria:

28.9.2017 Unique research-Umfrage: 
ÖVP 33%FPÖ 26%SPÖ 24%NEOS 6%Grüne 5%Pilz 4%, Sonstige 3% 
(Befragte: n = 1000, Befragungszeitraum 25.9.-28.9.2017; für die Tageszeitung Österreich)

17.9.2017 IMAS-Umfrage: 
ÖVP 33-35%FPÖ 23-25%SPÖ 22-24%Grüne 7-9%NEOS 3-5%Pilz 3-5%, Sonstige ...% 
(Befragte: n = 1033, Zeitraum: 17. August - 11. September 2017, für die Kronenzeitung.)

11.9.2017 market-Umfrage (David Pfarrhofer): 
ÖVP 33%SPÖ 26%FPÖ 24%NEOS 5%Pilz 5%Grüne 4%, Sonstige 3% 
(Befragte: n = 814, maximale Schwankungsbreite +/- 3,4%, für die Tageszeitung Der Standard.)

10.9.2017 OGM-Umfrage 
ÖVP 33%SPÖ 25%FPÖ 25%Grüne 5%NEOS 5%Pilz 5%, Sonstige 2% 
(Befragte: n = 805, maximale Schwankungsbreite +/- 3,0%, für die Tageszeitung KURIER.)

Don't ask me what NEOS and Pilz are. Until an hour ago I didn't even know they were a thing. What's very important is that in early October evidence for dirty campaigning of the SPÖ came to light, so the party is expected to suffer in the election and therefore the above surveys are probably misrepresenting support for the SPÖ as prospective voters might be disgusted by the scandal and vote for a different party or stay at home.

Looks like dark times ahead for Austria. A burqa ban has become effective at the beginning of this month and to cloud its racist motivations, it also prohibits other ways of covering your face. Therefore, someone covering their face with a scarf during the cold months of the year can be punished with a €150 fine if the police deems the temperature as not cold enough. I am not joking, this is real.

So what's next for Austria in the near future is that there is going to be a referendum to join Germany. I don't want to live in the same country as vivster. I wish I was overexaggerating, but this isn't like the presidential election last year where a positive outcome was more probable than a negative outcome.

Yeah Canada has the buraa ban on transport and same to cover it they have added other things. It's so damn ridiculous like if a terrorist or anyone dangerous is looking to attack you, why would he/she bring attention to himself/herself? They would probably be the most Canadian acting group in the bunch wouldn't they unless they are complete morons on top of being completely loony 



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

Radek said:
Vinther1991 said:
The first thing you should worry about is your rhetoric. A burqa ban is not racist

Ban all burqas, it's Europe not Somalia or Syria..

Really? You would accuse Muslim nations like KSA of being "oppressive" if they ban other articles of clothing for women(KSA is oppressive for various other reasons far greater than this and I don't promote banning of any article of clothing) but when you ban it it suddenly becomes "progressive". I don't understand the logic women can be as nude as they want but not as covered as they want? Like is this some weird western males reverse psychology where they are tricking their women into thinking they want to be as close to nude as possible so that they can jerk off to them or something? And traditional European clothing of many places have women wearing some sort of hat or clothing covering their hair so even in a traditional European sense it does not make sense? If you think banning any article of clothing is good then you damn sure should be supportive of KSA's laws to ban other articles of clothing other than buraa or else you are one of the biggest hypocrites I have seen



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

Vinther1991 said:
RolStoppable said:

What is it then?

It’s a tool to integrate muslims better into western society, and get rid of the parallel-society we have gotten in Europe. A woman wearing a burqa can’t get a job or interact well with western civilisation in any way. With a burqa ban you clearly show that if you decide to live in Europe, you live in accordance with European culture and leave the female-opressive elements of your middle-eastern culture and religion behind

I don't care if I get banned screw you and your "better" way of living. Same European bullshit that caused the majority of problems we have today thinking they are superior. You think women covered are being oppressed somehow and nude actresses in Hollywood are not? Is there a linear relationship between nudeness and less oppression with a negative slope? You can do your job interact well with others be a role model be independent integrate into any society with or without the buraa this has nothing to do with integration this will only stunt the integration. Why don't you ban hats while you're at it or what the Sikhs wear or the turbans that people from the middle East wear next. 



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

Vinther1991 said:
RolStoppable said:

That doesn't line up with the facts though. The people who put this law in place in Austria didn't make it a law against burqas, but really everything that a face can be covered with. It's so ridiculous in its execution that the driver for the decision has to be xenophobic motivations. Here's a fun story:

https://www.thelocal.at/20171010/shark-mask-wearer-falls-foul-of-austrias-burqa-law

It's not a joke. This is real.

Here's an article about how big of an issue the burqa is in Austria:

https://qz.com/1090885/austria-just-slapped-a-burqa-ban-on-the-150-women-who-dare-to-wear-one/

One hundred and fifty.

I said a burqa ban was a good idea (and not racist, you still didn’t explain why it is) I didn’t endorse the way it was implemented in Austria. There is a, I might say, ‘dated’ and unnuanced human right that prohibit any sort of discrimination of a religion, which is why they made the law this way. They could probably still modify it so it works as intended.

The fact that a burqa ban would only target 150 or so is a bad argument not to make it. If only 150 were affected by pedophilia, should that then be legal? A small step in the right direction is still a step in the right direction. Besides, it also has a strong signal value, that we don’t accept religiosly justified female opression.

We don't accept religiously justified female oppression we accept legally justified female oppression. Who are you to decide what cloth is oppressive. I can damn well choose to wear a jacket in summer covered in scarfs it's none of your concern. Forcing people to wear or not to wear something is still oppression. It doesn't work the way you think. If the woman has a choice always had a choice no one forced her not her parents nor spouse not anyone and she still CHOOSES to wear a burqa then there is nothing oppressive about it. What's oppressive is if she wants to wear one but the law prohibits it. It's one of the most ridiculous pieces of legislation to come out of any country. You have no problems with atheists and christians raping people in Hollywood you are more concerned about what a woman CHOOSES to wear in Europe. Oh I am Jewish and I am so oppressed I have to wear a hat. Guess what not all Muslim women in Pakistan wear a burqa let alone anywhere on Europe. That alone should tell you something. People wear all sorts of things as long as the law allows it and full on nudity is something else but other than that if KSA lifts the ban today, you will see many women wear what they want. Hell some still do and sometimes they are caught and sometimes they are not. Integrating into society doesn't mean you throw your ideals and culture away. It means you embrace the good of both sides and things that don't clash with your ideals and culture. If they clash too much then you probably should just leave the place but last time I checked covering your head with a piece of clothing doesn't clash with any culture. No where does it say people should not wear hats for example. Nuns wear basically the same thing Muslim women do. That is another good question are nuns banned from wearing their clothes?



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

Kerotan said:
Vinther1991 said:

It’s a tool to integrate muslims better into western society, and get rid of the parallel-society we have gotten in Europe. A woman wearing a burqa can’t get a job or interact well with western civilisation in any way. With a burqa ban you clearly show that if you decide to live in Europe, you live in accordance with European culture and leave the female-opressive elements of your middle-eastern culture and religion behind

Yeah look I agree but people like Rol are entitled to say the burca should be allowed. Personally I think they should be allowed cover their heads not their faces.  Like if an Irish person goes walking down town wearing a balaclava I'd prefer the police tell him to remove it. 

 

But these people who argue Europe should let them do what they want lose all legitimacy if they don't also equally argue Muslim countries should be completely acceptable of us.  Because we have much stricter rules to follow in their countries then they do here. 

I'm saying this as a joke but man if you only eat halal, nothing is more stricter than living in a non Muslim country so limited in options. But you are right Muslim nations are needlessly too strict. It's because our right propaganda artists won and yours lost but are gaining ground again. Centre is the way to go and that would be ideal for all nations of the world. Left being dangerous as an example in California giving someone give knowingly in full consciousness is not a felony. So you could destroy multiple people's lives and get a slap on the wrist for it



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also