I want this game, but I don't want to buy a Switch for only 1 game I'd own for a long time. Nintendo has changed (or maybe I've grown up) and I no longer care for Nintendo style gaming without Mario in the title.
I want this game, but I don't want to buy a Switch for only 1 game I'd own for a long time. Nintendo has changed (or maybe I've grown up) and I no longer care for Nintendo style gaming without Mario in the title.
| Green098 said: https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2017/10/11/what-to-make-of-that-perfect-super-mario-odyssey-review-score/#73a8c754453f
|
HAHHAHA that last part is amazing!
| Green098 said: https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2017/10/11/what-to-make-of-that-perfect-super-mario-odyssey-review-score/#73a8c754453f |
The only problem i have with this is: if he was just skeptical of a game,sure,he has the right to do it.But a journalist inplying that a direct competitor is been paid because of an early review copy is just distateful in my opinion.They are not random people on youtube comment section,they are professionals with voice.
That's just as bad as developers shitting on each others games.It's not an elegant thing to do.
Finale said:
The only problem i have with this is: if he was just skeptical of a game,sure,he has the right to do it.But a journalist inplying that a direct competitor is been paid because of an early review copy is just distateful in my opinion.They are not random people on youtube comment section,they are professionals with voice. That's just as bad as developers shitting on each others games.It's not an elegant thing to do. |
Well one reviewer gave Sonic 06 a 9.5. I believe that was the first review that came out for that game. You think any deals were made for that?
KLXVER said:
Well one reviewer gave Sonic 06 a 9.5. I believe that was the first review that came out for that game. You think any deals were made for that? |
And?
I'm not saying this things don't happen,i'm saying this journalist did an not elegant move,because EDGE is a respectable magazine and inplying that they were paid to give mario a 10 is a dick move for a professional to do.
Finale said:
And? I'm not saying this things don't happen,i'm saying this journalist did an not elegant move,because EDGE is a respectable magazine and inplying that they were paid to give mario a 10 is a dick move for a professional to do. |
Did he apply they were paid off? Getting the review out early would be great for EDGE, so maybe that was the deal?
KLXVER said:
Did he apply they were paid off? Getting the review out early would be great for EDGE, so maybe that was the deal? |
That's not the point.He's a professional journalist.He can't inply that a competitor is making something unethical based only in speculation.And yes,he directly inply that EDGE is suspecious for getting a review copy early.If you think they are,fine,you have your opinion.But if you work for a company and say that in a social media you are making an statement.And that's very serious for him and for forbes.
KLXVER said:
Did he apply they were paid off? Getting the review out early would be great for EDGE, so maybe that was the deal? |
First of all, Nintendo is pretty serious when it comes to things like FTC disclosure etc so I highly doubt they paid EDGE off.
And yes, just because it came out early due to EDGE magazines publishing schedule he said;
"It cheapens the perfect score because we can't help but wonder if it's all above board, or if secret deals were struck behind the scenes."
Implying Nintendo made some kind of secret deal to ensure EDGE gave the game a perfect score, and he also wnet further to say that no one should not take the review seriously or give it any merit;
"So my suggestion would be to take this with a massive, heaping hat full of salt. I have confidence that Super Mario Odyssey will be a good game (I've enjoyed what little I've played) but I wouldn't place much value on this sort of lone review."
Green098 said:
First of all, Nintendo is pretty serious when it comes to FTC disclosure so I highly doubt they paid EDGE off. And yes, just because it came out early due to EDGE magazines publishing schedule he said; "It cheapens the perfect score because we can't help but wonder if it's all above board, or if secret deals were struck behind the scenes." Implying Nintendo made some kind of secret deal to ensure EDGE gave the game a perfect score, and he also wnet further to say that no one should not take the review seriously or give it any merit; "So my suggestion would be to take this with a massive, heaping hat full of salt. I have confidence that Super Mario Odyssey will be a good game (I've enjoyed what little I've played) but I wouldn't place much value on this sort of lone review." |
I dont really see the problem here. Why did EDGE get to publish their review so early compared to other publications? Why should anyone ever take one single review as word of how a game is? Just seems logical for him to be suspicious to me. Maybe he could have written it better, but I see his point.
Green098 said:
First of all, Nintendo is pretty serious when it comes to things like FTC disclosure etc so I highly doubt they paid EDGE off. And yes, just because it came out early due to EDGE magazines publishing schedule he said; "It cheapens the perfect score because we can't help but wonder if it's all above board, or if secret deals were struck behind the scenes." Implying Nintendo made some kind of secret deal to ensure EDGE gave the game a perfect score, and he also wnet further to say that no one should not take the review seriously or give it any merit; "So my suggestion would be to take this with a massive, heaping hat full of salt. I have confidence that Super Mario Odyssey will be a good game (I've enjoyed what little I've played) but I wouldn't place much value on this sort of lone review." |
Well, between EDGE and Forbes I know which review I will be completely ignoring, and it's not EDGE.