By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KLXVER said:
Finale said:

The only problem i have with this is: if he was just skeptical of a game,sure,he has the right to do it.But a journalist inplying that a direct competitor is been paid because of an early review copy is just distateful in my opinion.They are not random people on youtube comment section,they are professionals with voice.

That's just as bad as developers shitting on each others games.It's not an elegant thing to do.

Well one reviewer gave Sonic 06 a 9.5. I believe that was the first review that came out for that game. You think any deals were made for that?

And?

I'm not saying this things don't happen,i'm saying this journalist did an not elegant move,because EDGE is a respectable magazine and inplying that they were paid to give mario a 10 is a dick move for a professional to do.