Thanks.

Feminist Frequency is definitely one of the most sexist people on Twitter, but I wouldn't call her 'media'. She's simply an annoying person who likes attention.

I agree that Buzzfeed is one of the worst and most biased news outlets out there. I've read some Buzzfeed articles, a lot of them made me wonder if they're just trolling or actually being serious.

CNN - While I don't agree with everything in the article and they seem to exaggerate a lot of things, they do bring up a good point. Women and people with different skin colours are still underrepresented in the American government & congress.

Vox - I don't get what's wrong with this article. The article is completely factual. They're merely pointing out that the US doesn't need to panic about Muslim terrorism, because there are bigger problems - like racist attacks. Nowhere in the article did they say that white men are (on average) more dangerous than others. (Although the 'white' in the title is maybe a bit unnecessary.)

There's a lot more vox articles that are worse than that. Perhaps I should have just took a screen shot of the head lines they have regarding white men. It's the same with cnn. They have a lot of pieces on white men or white people in general. I think cnn is looking at diversity from a racist perspective rather than looking at if there's anyone barring minorities from getting into government. 

I sourced anita because she's often applaunded by femnists around the world for her crazy quotes/positions on things and she's often asked about her opinions from companies on things. She's very dangerous to gaming or entertainment in general.

Use this.  It's a pretty well put together continuum of the politcal leaning of major media outlets.

https://i.imgur.com/PqVFN6U.jpg

OP said that he is refering to stories that came after the Las Vegas shooting.
And regarding the first link, the author questions what it means to be racist. It's not demonizing white people, but posing a question to them.

Though I don't think anyone denies that white people have commited the most horrible attrocities to mankind in our history. That doesn't mean that we should all be held accountable for those actions, or that it's a common opinion among news outlets that we should.

Anyway, I'm curious exactly what news outlets OP is refering to. If it's one obscure underground news outlet that has 78 readers, and not CNN, MSNBC, etc , then don't just say "liberal media" because leaving it at that that is ambigous at best, and misleading. Say exactly which publication is saying this.

Don't all black people already own guns?

Intersting to see how many media outlets are strongly politically biased, on both sides. The only one I'm really familiar with is BBC News, which seems to be pretty good.

Since the Las Vegas shooting I am noticing a disturbing trend where people in the liberal media and elsewhere are collectively demonising a group of people based on the colour of their skin. This group is 'white men'.

I'm not sure what the whiteness of a persons' skin has to do with their character. Dr Martin Luther King would be appalled.  If anyone referred to any other group in a negative light i.e 'black women', or 'brown people' they would probably end up being fired (or worse).

I see these groups saying that if this was an Islamic terror attack, all Muslims would be demonised. This is a false equivalence. Islam is not a race, it's a set of (really bad) ideas. ISIS read and refer to the same texts as moderate muslims. Bad ideas can be criticised. Most importantly though, Muslims can be any colour. Just as communists, Christians and fascists can be.

I can't believe the liberal media don't see the double standard, and dangerous people like Jared Taylor are just waiting for enough people to fall for the identity politics to build a political platform based on 'race realism'. He claims he is not a white supremacist. But read his work, he considers black people akin to a different species.

We can't let this happen. We saw the results of this over 70 years ago. Wake up.