No MH3 was cancelled on PS3 because the PS3 was having its erratic early years and Capcom were put off by the development costs of HD.

If there was a swtich version it would have missed the Janurary release date. There will be a delay. Announcing a Switch port or MH now will cannibalize MHW. 

If you think porting is easy then where is DW9? Where is DQXI? 

also, it seems I was right about splatoon. People told me it will be 1:1 without bundle. it seems I was right. Also there are still Spaltoon bundles but minimal. without a doubt that is nice leg.

So Ultra Street Fighter II's brilliant then?  

Why are you even trying to make things personal?

I don't care about your history, your usual critiques, how much you went through the thread or how fair you are. 

If you say "A company favoring 60M customers over 5M customers is a double standard", you're completely wrong. It's a completely logical, normal and standard business decision made by thousands of companies around the world everyday. That's all.

So yes, Capcom will keep releasing games on the 60M userbase (or even 90M if you take the Xbox One too, and a lot more with PC) even if some of their games fail on it. And yes, they would abandon a 5M userbase far more easily. The fact that you're unhappy with it won't change what the logical decision is here. 

Then you did not read my post. Sad, sad form.

"Like I said above, we can't say anything about it as long as the same games do not release on the 2 consoles at the same time."

...Which is entirely the fault of Capcom. 

" You can't use the SF2/MvC comparison to say "their Switch games sell better". For example, we could easily say that the Switch didn't have a fighting game when SF2 released (IIRC), while the PS4 already has quite a few. And that's without even talking the quality. This comparison is too fragile to be worth anything."

Yes you can. You easily can. While it is true that the Switch didn't have a fighting game, that's a poor point to make when a 40$ edition of a fighting game that's nearly 30 years old sells better than MvCInfinite. Now of course, there could be problems with the comparison. But it's Capcom's own fault by validating this comparison by releasing double-standards "tests" onto the Switch. It's not a direct parity in terms of comparison, sure. But most arguments aren't. 

"The SFV exclusivity doesn't have anything to do with the Switch (you wanted them to release the game on Switch long before the console came out?)."

Who said anything about SFV releasing on Switch back in 2016? I'm talking about any time this year - or hell a confirmation of it. 

" But saying "OMG, MvC bombed, so MH World is doomed" is ridiculous. "

I don't think, and I hope to god, it doesn't bomb. Doesn't mean Capcom shouldn't have ported it to Switch, or at least developed the game around numerous systems.

Don't worry, I'm really not saying that Capcom is not at fault anywhere. Their games are selling poorly, so they're doing something wrong anyway.

I really think that SFV is over now, they just have a small team on it for the regular new content. I don't think they would put a larger team and take the time now to develop new versions of this game (Xbox One or Switch). It would be beating a dead horse, and being even more laughed at if it failed again. It's too late now IMO. But hey, they've done weird things before, so we never know. 

Poor Dragon Quest XI on ps4, now it's almost out of the top 20.
Great Switch sales.

Ah so it was you who i couldnt remember lol. Yeah splat2 bundles were almost non existent this week. Its not 1:1 (or close) like i/we thought. That said its still very high in terms of sales and its just the beginning. Itll sell high no doubt even without bundling but yeah you were right

First of all what Im talking about a franchise which is about as easy to predict its sucess on a hybrid system as MH.MHW would sell gangbusters on the Switch.DW 9 is not a garantee by any means, and its developed by another company(Koei), which already has a mosuo game comming to the Switch that has a higher chance to appeal to that audience than DW 9(Which would be FE Warriors).

For DQ XI, its most likely because they already have the 3DS version as the portable option, so there wouldnt be the need to rush its release, for as much as this sucks.That in turns would maximize sales, because then you would have the pS4 version on a portable system some months later, which would make the 3DS owners double dip, instead of just jumping to the Switch version instead(My guess obviously).But even then, this goes against the first point you brought up, since DQ XI for Switch was announced before these versions released, and as far as I can see, it didnt canabilize the sales of these said versions.The same could be said for MHW(even though i actually agree with you that this way they will sell more, as shitty as this sounds).

And its not me that thinks porting is easy.Its the countless developers that make actual games that have said so.Of course that easy is relative, since it still take months to bring over the game, depending how big and ambitious said game is, but its nowhere near like bringing to the Wii U( a game it can handle).