| Faelco said: |
"Like I said above, we can't say anything about it as long as the same games do not release on the 2 consoles at the same time."
...Which is entirely the fault of Capcom.
" You can't use the SF2/MvC comparison to say "their Switch games sell better". For example, we could easily say that the Switch didn't have a fighting game when SF2 released (IIRC), while the PS4 already has quite a few. And that's without even talking the quality. This comparison is too fragile to be worth anything."
Yes you can. You easily can. While it is true that the Switch didn't have a fighting game, that's a poor point to make when a 40$ edition of a fighting game that's nearly 30 years old sells better than MvCInfinite. Now of course, there could be problems with the comparison. But it's Capcom's own fault by validating this comparison by releasing double-standards "tests" onto the Switch. It's not a direct parity in terms of comparison, sure. But most arguments aren't.
"The SFV exclusivity doesn't have anything to do with the Switch (you wanted them to release the game on Switch long before the console came out?)."
Who said anything about SFV releasing on Switch back in 2016? I'm talking about any time this year - or hell a confirmation of it.
" But saying "OMG, MvC bombed, so MH World is doomed" is ridiculous. "
I don't think, and I hope to god, it doesn't bomb. Doesn't mean Capcom shouldn't have ported it to Switch, or at least developed the game around numerous systems.
