As I mentioned in the past thread, I've zero issues with Wolfenstein 2, so why would I have issues with it here?

My issue is that the large majority of the games are late ports of old indies off of other consoles, I clearly said if most titles were parallel releases that would be cool and impressive.

Pointing to one single title that's sort of (as you say, a few months off of being parallel) doing that, doesn't change what I said, at all.

I dissapprove of the third party support a whole, because while some good titles are making their way over (where the fuck is risk of rain though?), there's a lot of crap, and a lot of games being ported over just for the sake of tapping into the new market for additional sales now that their titles sales have peaked on other systems.

As you say, it happens for every early device, but as I said above, in those cases the support isn't impressive either, it's just predictable.

X company porting Y game over to Z system, months to years after it launched on other platforms is not about being super nice to Z systems fans, or to show your support for Z system, regardless of what the developer/publisher says, it's about milking the most money out of an existing game.

When big developers come forward and say, WE FULLY SUPPORT Z SYSTEM AND LOOK FORWARD TO A LONG AND HEALTHY RELATIONSHIP WITH Z SYSTEMS CUSTOMER BASE, what they're actually saying is, hey we're going to release our games on your systems too, if we butter you up before hand you're more likely to buy our shit.

As the WiiU has shown, those words and promises don't mean shit unless the resulting game sells enough for the publisher/developer to make decent enough profit to continue to do so, those promises and words sure dissapear fast when the sales come in below expectation.

So my take is, I don't care what any publisher/developer says, I care what they do and how what they do changes over the years.

Because I'm parodying this.

Also don't use "gross", it makes you sound like an entitled lefty.

Better?

A table to compare and contrast the two.

So what does this mean and how does it pertain to the OP?

The two systems launched with wholly opposite perceptions and realities. WiiU had everything going for it prior to launch. Before its showing and mediocre reaction at game shows just before launch, you had "unparalleled" support from 3rd parties. The success of Wii and power more aligned with PS360 lowered the risk 3rd parties used to evaluate early support. Of course all that fell through as the core concept of WiiU just didn't spark interest. Notable 3rd parties like EA saw this coming and abruptly changed their support in the six months before launch to only put out meh ports at best. 

Switch had as much pessimism as you can get leading up to launch. Nintendo didn't unveil the system until 6 months before launch. 3rd parties could not even get a hint of consumer interest until then. What they did know was that it would be an architecture closer to the competition but up to 1/2 the raw power. Imagine you are the CEO of these companies looking at the dismal WiiU and completely different take on Switch (which shared some core ideas of WiiU). Would you green light the funding to expand the scope of an in-process game to support Switch? I wouldn't.

This is why there is a difference in the number of games at launch. 3rd parties were cautious to begin with and then combining that with where they were with games already in development, it made more sense to only choose the potentially simpliest / low risk games to put the unplanned effort towards. That is why EA is giving FIFA and not Madden, etc.

Rol pushed this idea to me back at launch when I was expecting more titles for Q4. He was right. 2017 is just too late of a time frame for Switch when 3rd parties only really had dev kits in October 2016 and no one know the reception Switch would see until March 2017. 

Taking this reality into context you get a sense that Switch has a fantastic 2017 list of 3rd party games. They cover the gambit of genres and Nintendo themselves of course put out a lot of great games. 2018 will be a normalizing of support between Switch and its competition. We'll see all of the normal yearly games plus a good cross-section of the AAA stuff now that nearly every 3rd party will have built a Switch game in their dev tools.