Is Switch 3rd party support really that impressive?

[AngryLittleAlchemist]

NATO said:

AngryLittleAlchemist said:

So Wolfeinstein 2? 

Oh wait, is the excuse for that one going to be it's a few months off? 

As far as third party goes, you simply can't win with the Switch, in it's first year at least. There will always be something to complain about. It's not like Sony could do any better either, as the Vita has shown. It's simply hard to convince Western third party to support a handheld system. Though it does suck Capcom and Square are taking ages

As I mentioned in the past thread, I've zero issues with Wolfenstein 2, so why would I have issues with it here?

My issue is that the large majority of the games are late ports of old indies off of other consoles, I clearly said if most titles were parallel releases that would be cool and impressive.

Pointing to one single title that's sort of (as you say, a few months off of being parallel) doing that, doesn't change what I said, at all.

Ewww why do you and Hynad have the same avatar now? Gross.

The way I see it, there is honestly very little the Switch can do in it's first year to guarantee good-great third party support. It's simply very challenging. I don't think that giving it a bit of a pass compared to the X or PS is that bad, which is why I would consider it more so good then great or bad. 

Also my position on indie games has changed greatly thanks to Sonic Mania(even though it's not an indie game) and the Switch, so i'm not sure how to feel about the dissaprovel of indie games as good support. Some stuff like Golf Story or Steamworld Dig 2 is pretty cool to see.