Forward to 27:19
I wills state the obvious but PS4 and XBOX much better gfx
There is no logical reason for it, and we should make comment about it every 3rd party announcement.
| caffeinade said: Does not look quite as bad as I was expecting. |
And it's 60 FPS, expect nothing less

shenlong213 said:
And it's 60 FPS, expect nothing less
|
Hold on....
this shit's 60fps?

Texture quality took a pretty big hit. but it still looks good.
Bet with Adamblaziken:
I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.
If the framerate is solid, I'm getting this.
| shenlong213 said: And it's 60 FPS, expect nothing less |
Is it though? Has that been confirmed by the developers?
So that's how Doom would look if it was released 7 years earlier. Nintendo cashing in on nostalgia as usual.
User moderated - Bristow9091
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
| AngryLittleAlchemist said: Hold on....
this shit's 60fps? *snip* |
Doubt it ...
It took all of the CPU power on consoles to hit 60FPS ... (single threaded performance on Jaguar is a good 50% faster than cortex A57 and consoles have 2x more cores too)
| curl-6 said: If the framerate is solid, I'm getting this.
Is it though? Has that been confirmed by the developers? |
I don't think so. From the clip, it looked more like 30 fps than 60 fps. Still cool to see Doom coming to the Switch, though. Same with Wolfenstein 2 (was not expecting that at all).

About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
