This news is bigger than just these to games comi g to the Switch. It sends a big message to other developers that you can release all the new games on this wonderful machine. I will likely get both games, even though I have Doom already.

False equivalency. 

considering how other first person shooters fare on that platform Nintendo consoles, the real question is; Will nintendo fans buy them?

What other first person shooters are there on Switch?

Why would you just assume that you're "hitting a nerve"? 

It's not exact equivalence. The Switch is getting ports of current gen games. It is not the same as Playstation 3 or Xbox 360 games being ported over to the Xbox One and Playstation 4 to make their libraries look more impressive, which to be clear is what they were getting hate for, because these games are still current generation titles and are still relevent. It's a false equivalence to say that Doom coming to the Switch is like an old game being ported to a new platform to bolster it's library, cause the game isn't old.

My stance on ports has been consistent. I got a Wii U because it was the console delivering actually truely new experiences, and I loved it. When I see the same Nintendo fans that were making fun of the PS4 because it was the "portstation 4" excuse ports like Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, Pokken Tournament, or mediocre sequels like Splatoon 2 .. it definitely enrages me.

Doom is not even close to that scenario though.

"Exact" doesn't mean what you think it means, I suppose.

Doom and Wolfenstein II are both current generation games releasing/released on current generation platforms, not last-generation remasters/ports. Many people haven't gotten a chance to play Doom yet, and nobody has played Wolfenstein II yet. There are new exclusive titles releasing alongside them which makes the argument "only ports" not based on fact. And the platform has a form-factor which makes buying old ports enticing for those who like to play games on the go. 

In comparison people were annoyed that PS4/XBO multiplats were being hindered by last-generation versions, and that no high-profile exclusives (equivalent to say Mario Odyssey or Xenoblade Chronicles 2 ) were going to release for a while. The closest things on PS4 was Killzone Shadowfall or Infamous, both games which weren't setting metacritic on fire. Furthermore, their predecessors were popular which meant that more people likely played the original versions (as opposed to the few people who owned Wii U's.) 

The thing that annoyed people wasn't that there were ports, but that the ports were a tradeoff for new titles or inhibited the potential of multiplatform games, neither of which is the case with the Switch. So no, not "exact" equivalence. 

Right .. so dates are more important than the aligned generation or the specs relative to the standard version of the game... ok.. stretching that point...