Miyamotoo said:
DélioPT said:
But i wouldn't use price as a big factor. You see, if you say that "Switch has price point of Nintendo home console" as a rebuttal, you need to remember that 3DS was priced exactly as the Wii (it was 250 and not 200, as you wrote). Yet, you wouldn't say 3DS was a home console, would you?
Switch having SW price points similar to home consoles, might not be the best argument either. First, i have seen prices for 3DS Nintendo games, between 45-50. Second, i haven't it's known that Switch's cards are more expensive and have caused games to be higher in price (Rime, comes to mind). Third, i think it was just a matter of time until even handheld games saw a price surge. You can't continue to spend more money in developing more expensive games and not have that reflect on games' prices.
To me, Switch is a hybrid, but even then it's more of a home console because that's where it's strongest at. As you mentioned, it has a weaker battery, bigger dimensions than what a handheld could offer.
|
3DS had same price point like Wii that came out 5-6 years earlier, and point is that 3DS didn't sell at all with that price point and Nintendo needed to make big price cut early to in order that 3DS start selling.
You are obvously wrong, Switch has same price point of SW same like Wii U or earlier Wii, and 3DS has same price point of SW like DS had, difference between 3DS and Switch game price point is very obvious. Offical price of AAA 3DS games is $40, ofical price of Switch AAA games is $60. You dont need Rime at all, just look at Nintendo games and you are get picture. Why Switch games have AAA price point of home console, because obvious they are full home console AAA games that run and full home console mode.
http://www.nintendo.com/games/game-guide?pv=true#filter/3ds|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|featured|des|-
http://www.nintendo.com/games/game-guide?pv=true#filter/switch|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|featured|des|-|-
For me Switch is also hybrid.
|
Look, when you say that Switch isn't a portable becaus it is priced as a home console, then you have to say that 3DS was a home console because because it was also priced as Wii.
If it sold well or not at 250, it's irrelant.
If you don't draw this same conclusion for the same situation, then you'll contradict yourself.
From a price only point of view, you have to be coherent.
I never said that Switch software wasn't priced as Wii or Wii U (actually, it's more as Wii U than as Wii). So, where am i wrong?
I just mentioned that there are other factors that you need to consider instead of reading the price factor as a Nintendo's decision to treat Switch as a home console and therefore, raising the price of it's games.
You need to consider that cartridges' prices also went up and if dev costs went up, prices naturally went up, making it almost irrelevant if we are talking about handhelds or home consoles. As in, taking those two aspects into consideration, even if Switch was just a handheld, prices would most likely be the same as they are today.