Ah the original, that's certainly worth playing. Still looks pretty good for a 15 year old game.
I'm currently playing Syberia 3 with my wife. It's not bad (although it runs terribly on ps4) yet it wasn't worth the 13 year wait since the second one. It's not the same game without Oscar as a companion. (Still hoping he will somehow be revived/rebuild at some point in the story)
Look at Minecraft, your 4k prowess has been topped


That's nice I suppose. The first two games are definitely worth playing, but I don't see any reason to get the game on the Switch since you can just get both of them for much cheaper on PC.
Companies do realize they don't have to show us what features the Switch has now, right? I'm more concerned with gameplay. From that trailer, I'm not even sure what kind of game it is. Action? Point and click? Survival Horror?




It would be nice to get all of them in one cartridge.
| d21lewis said: Companies do realize they don't have to show us what features the Switch has now, right? I'm more concerned with gameplay. From that trailer, I'm not even sure what kind of game it is. Action? Point and click? Survival Horror? |
Classic point and click adventure game, puzzles with inventory items. It's all about the story and characters.
The first sits at 82 on Metacritic, second 80, Syberia 3 hangs at 51. It did not make a good transition to 3D with heavy rain style controls. The puzzles are still decent yet it frequently hits 0 fps with extreme stuttering, long loading times between sections you're forced to go back and forth in, and operating certain things with the analog sticks is confusing and way harder then it should be.
The first one was very memorable though, hence I bought 3 regardless of reviews.
| Darashiva said: That's nice I suppose. The first two games are definitely worth playing, but I don't see any reason to get the game on the Switch since you can just get both of them for much cheaper on PC. |
Do you always just go with the cheaper option being the best way to play a game? If so I'm guessing you didn't buy GTAV on the PC for example as it would have been cheaper to buy an X360 copy of the game.
It's just strange logic to me to overlook the obvious value that certain ports bring to the table.
As for the trailer, seen it pop up on the switch and gotta agree with Lewis, this just shows a bunch of cutscenes and how the switch can be played with... it might as well have been displaying a video of someone washing plates in a sink for all the info it told about the game, other than it has ps1/2 era cgi cutscenes which include trains.
Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive


Ganoncrotch said:
Do you always just go with the cheaper option being the best way to play a game? If so I'm guessing you didn't buy GTAV on the PC for example as it would have been cheaper to buy an X360 copy of the game. It's just strange logic to me to overlook the obvious value that certain ports bring to the table. As for the trailer, seen it pop up on the switch and gotta agree with Lewis, this just shows a bunch of cutscenes and how the switch can be played with... it might as well have been displaying a video of someone washing plates in a sink for all the info it told about the game, other than it has ps1/2 era cgi cutscenes which include trains. |
Depends on the game and what features the different versions have. In this particular case I really see no reason to get the Switch version if you own any kind of PC capable of playing games from 15 years ago. I was just talking about Syberia, not any other game or their different ports.