Is he going to ban women from formal education next, so the boys won't be distracted?
Yes, yes, I'm being facetious. It's the only response I have left for the frustration that has been Trumps presidency.
You support this? | |||
No. | 206 | 29.68% | |
Yes. | 311 | 44.81% | |
^ What the hell is wrong ... | 177 | 25.50% | |
Total: | 694 |
Is he going to ban women from formal education next, so the boys won't be distracted?
Yes, yes, I'm being facetious. It's the only response I have left for the frustration that has been Trumps presidency.
People are going to be outraged, but honestly, how many transgender people wants to enroll in military?
Seriously, how many people are we really talking about here? 10? 15 each year?
aikohualda said:
It is classified in DSM-5 that doesn't mean it it a serious mental disorder...
erectile dysfunction is identified in DSM-5.... so if you cannot get boner, you cannot join the military? |
Not many boners gonna happen anyway with a bunch of trannies running around. ;)
mizzou_guy said:
You realize women don't wear dresses when they're in military garb, right? Men and woman wear very similar uniforms. Plus, as said earlier, the majority of military jobs are domestic and not in barracks. |
Well women do have finally recieved specialized armor molds in 2016 after having to wear the male ones for years, wich put them at a significant disatvantage in combat.
Women have shorter torsos and smaller waists as well as wider hips, so the male molds would press in at all sorts of places they weren't designed to put pressure on and provide insufficient protection.
Not that I want to endorse Superman4s inane comment in any way. I just wanted to point out that women and men have been wearing exactly the same armor in the US military. So much so, that it was detrimental to womens health and safety.
maxleresistant said: People are going to be outraged, but honestly, how many transgender people wants to enroll in military? |
Accordig to info in this thread, on the first page, there are:
StarOcean said:
About 2,500-7,000 in active military and 1,400-4,000 in reserves |
I'm sure you can roughly do the math percentagewise from that.
Whether a person is fit to serve in the military should have nothing to do with anything except their physical and mental suitability for the job. Other factors are completely irrelevant, and claiming otherwise is just nonsensical.
All these people complaining about the costs of Transgender health care(as in caring for health) should note that the army spends 84 million dollars on erectile dysfunction medicine, 41 million of which are for viagra alone. By comparison estimates are that including more transgender health care measurements will be around 8 million at the most extreme. Small cost considering they spend about 6 billion in total
I find it disgusting a draft dodger has the galls to make a call like this. Trans soldiers have more bravery in their left pinky toe than Trump has had his entire life.
(Formerly RCTjunkie)
SuperNova said:
Accordig to info in this thread, on the first page, there are:
I'm sure you can roughly do the math percentagewise from that. |
What? that many?
Well, I guess that is a problem then.