Locknuts said:
GProgrammer said:
48% positive coverage for trump! Seems far too much WRT what he's actually achieved,
Or do you think every topic should have a 50-50 balance?
eg 50% positive ISIS coverage, 50% positive coverage for people that believe in a flat earth etc
|
What a strange thing to type.
Anyway, considering Fox News viewership are more likely to have been the ones to elect Trump into office, I think having 52% negative coverage is pretty balanced. He has had his achievements.
Overall though I think he is working very hard to do the things he was elected to do, sometimes he gets is wrong but not 93% of the time. Lol.
|
Its not a strange thing to type its just pointing out have a 50:50 balance is often not a good viewpoint, if its so far from the reality, Its much better to report the Facts.
He is probably doing worse than you think, eg Check his website
I don't know if you remember before the Election he released a document,
https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf
---------------------------
Donald Trump's contract with the American Voter
What follows is my 100-day action plan to Make America Great Again
------------------------------------------------------
Check the 2nd page, He promised 10 pieces of legislation. OK now its after 100 days so how many do you think got done?, 4 or 5 maybe.
No, Zero. He achieved not a single thing from his Contract with the American Voter, he could not of done worse, he just has a habit of promising the world and then failing to deliver, its just his modus operandi