GProgrammer said:
48% positive coverage for trump! Seems far too much WRT what he's actually achieved, Or do you think every topic should have a 50-50 balance? eg 50% positive ISIS coverage, 50% positive coverage for people that believe in a flat earth etc |
What a strange thing to type.
Anyway, considering Fox News viewership are more likely to have been the ones to elect Trump into office, I think having 52% negative coverage is pretty balanced. He has had his achievements.
Overall though I think he is working very hard to do the things he was elected to do, sometimes he gets is wrong but not 93% of the time. Lol.







