No suckerpunch should focus on their new IP and I think Infamous is better than Sly.
Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar
No suckerpunch should focus on their new IP and I think Infamous is better than Sly.
Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar
I was late to the Sly party, having only first played it in the summer of 2013 when I tried the Sly Trilogy on the PS3. I really enjoyed it. That was easily enough to get me to buy Sly 4 on PS3, which also came with a voucher for a digital copy of the Vita version. Again, really enjoyed it. So, yes. I would love to see another one, and hope it gets the green light.
Edit- It looks like I probably already had Sly 4 purchased before I played the Sly Trilogy.
- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."
Qwark said: No suckerpunch should focus on their new IP and I think Infamous is better than Sly. |
It doesn't have to be Sucker Punch developing it. They didn't make Sly 4.
Thieves in Time was honestly really awesome. It's too bad Sanzaru Games wasn't given another chance because there's some great talent there.
Boutros said: Thieves in Time was honestly really awesome. It's too bad Sanzaru Games wasn't given another chance because there's some great talent there. |
Unfortunately, it seems like Sony cut ties with Sanzaru, sort of like they did with Ready at Dawn after The Order.
Teeqoz said:
Unfortunately, it seems like Sony cut ties with Sanzaru, sort of like they did with Ready at Dawn after The Order. |
Yeah, Sony is stupid.
Boutros said:
Yeah, Sony is stupid. |
Yup. I loved Sly 4, I don't know why Sony would burn bridges with Sanzaru, even if the game didn't sell too well, why would you reduce your options like that?
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.