it's honestly not a remotely bold prediction. If MH World doesn't do stellar it will very likely happen. Not to mention it's still technically possible that Switch does get the game at release too, not impossible.

Also the footage of MH World did not look that graphically impressive, it almost certainly could be put onto the Switch.

really just depends on Capcom. They have a tendency to be kind of lazy with releases on multiplatforms, like I wouldn't be surprised if they did release MH World on the Switch if they just put it out in Japan :/

EA will always make money thanks to the popularity of sports titles. They aren't a good example at all. 

The same goes for Activision with CoD. 

Capcom posted a loss on their PnL sheet last year. 

That is the single best explaination of why companies do DLC that I have ever heard. Would you believe that FFXV just broke even on that 5 million sales? It costs $600,000 to $1,800,000 to develop a 3DS game. Even if Square only netted $10 per copy of Bravely they would have made a profit of 13 million. That's a profit ratio of seven to one, even if we assume development costs of 1.8 million. Assuming that FFXV pocketed $13 per game sale we can assume that FFXV cost sixtyfive million to produce. If everyone bought their DLC for $20 that would be a hundred million in profit from DLC. So we have FFXV that spent 65 million to make 165 million, versus Bravely which spent 1.8 million (worst case scenario) to make 13 million. 

AA games often make several times their production costs back. Tons of AAA games outright fail to make any money back period. 

Bringing this back on topic, the OP is mostly right. Capcom will either wind up porting Worlds to the Switch, or they will go back to making portable MH games.  Either way Switch is getting a new Monster Hunter eventually. 

So you're saying FFXV made 100 million and Bravely only made 11.2 million

That 100 million figure is based on a hypothetical event. If Square winds up selling $20 in DLC to every single FFXV owner FFXV would make 100 million in profit. Bravely on the other hand made 11.2 million in profit already. 

Profit to expenses wise, I think Capcom is better off putting MH on Switch than they are going multiplatform. If MH4 cost 1.8 million to make, and if Capcom gets $10 for every copy of MH4 sold, then that's 40 million that MH4 made for Capcom. And they only had to spend a fraction of that. On the other hand if MH Worlds winds up costing 20 million to make, and only sells 3 million copies at $12 a copy... that's 36 million dollars in revenue. Or a profit of 16 million after recouping the expenses of developing Worlds. 

the switch as you can see in all the E3 trailers can only handle cell shaded graphics in order to hide the lack of texture quality.   Even games like Xenoblade Chronicles 2 have cell shade characters ALA Kingdom hearts 3 (it was not like that in the previous game), but the world tries to look real like in FFXV.  The art style of the game is a fugly mess, and even "cheating" using cell shaded characters, the "high quality" textures that try to resemble a real life look in the environment, look blury as hell in that game.

they should have go cell shaded all the way.