No, of course not. That's not how it works. You need a GTX 1080 Ti to do ultra AND 60 FPS. I have Ryzen 7 1800x paired with a GTX 1080 Ti....
Okay, in all seriousness, personally, I got the best I could get for the money, without going insane, (Titan Xp 2017)
I personally, would not settle for a GTX 1070, nor a 1080. Nothing from AMD, other than Ryzen interested me at all. I didn't care about the 1700, nor the 1700x, I went straight for the 1800x.
My PC, and warrenties, taxes, etc. ended up costing me over 3,000 dollars. I needed 8 cores. I'm not just playing games on my PC. I needed more than a 1080, because I wanted minimal frame drops when I'm multi-tasking. Do you need all that stuff? No. I don't play games at 60 FPS on this PC. Everything I play is at 90 FPS, minimum, unless I'm multi-tasking. Most games, when I'm not multitasking, will let me go above 144 FPS, which is my monitor's maximum refreshrate.
Adding it things-- What resolution are you playing at?
1080p, I get worse gaming performance than playing 1440p. Yes, I have to increase my resolution to get higher frame rates. I can't really tell you one thing from another, because if you want 60 FPS from every PC game in 2017, I doubt even my GTX 1080 Ti will let me do that. What does ultra settings mean when you game at 700p, or 900p, 1080, or even 2560p, or 3840p.
So, you're going to have to be realistic. And, if you're the type of person who asks, "what will get me 60 FPS at ultra settings for every 2017 game," you have tons to learn. Not every game is going to press your CPU. Not ever game is going to press the GPU. Look at GTAV. If your CPU is trash, it will bottleneck the game,. I don't care if you have a gtx 1280 ti delivered to you from the future. Some games, the opposite is true.