Konami easily

I agree, Konami has definitely made more mistakes and at a staggering degree. I still stand by what I said though. EA abuses microtransactions too. EA is more relevant in the gaming industry and that is what makes them worse in my opinion. People still flock to EA. Whereas the hatred that Konami has received (which has been well deserved) has caused them to gradually become more obscure as time goes by. The name Konami means very little to gamers and their games do not have a large enough presence anymore.

Konami really let the ball drop on Silent Hills and every other property that they have held hostage. Their prominence in the gaming industry has greatly diminished, whereas EA is still as relevant as ever. This is what makes EA worse in my opinion.

Nintendo.

Nah just messing with ya, Konami.

EA is always a popular pick...

I dont think Ubisoft should belong though. Even if I dont really like their games per say, I have big respect for them since they are really the only AAA publisher that actually tries new stuff almost every year.

I wouldn’t say they are the worst per se (especially looking at some of the other names in these comments.) but I think Bioware has definitely “fallen from grace,” at least in the minds of many loyal fans from the PS3/Xbox360 era.

Agree, what's really bad from a developer who made castlevania, contra, metal gear, suikoden...

EA easily. The Queen of generic sports and shooter titles. Even their better showings, like the Star Wars Battlefront remake, are all style over substance

Konami is a logical vote but unfortunately Konami just doesn't MAKE many games anymore so its hard for me to consider them triple A at this point. They aren't releasing anywhere near enough games to put into the AAA category, Capcom and Sega release wayyyy more than Konami has in years. And the only big game Konami has released in the last like 5 years was the latest Metal Gear installment. Konami is dead as far as the gaming industry is concerned, and Bomberman R doesn't change that

Hard for me to shat on Activision when they've put out some colorful big titles recentely, Overwatch.

I almost picked Ubisoft because they had SO many years in a row of terribly blah looking toward climbing games that all seemed the same. When Farcry and Assassin's Creed feel extremely similar but are plot wise opposites- that's a problem. That said Ubisoft has seemed SLIGHTLY better recently as far as variety. Maybe I'm just blinded because they didn't do their yearly shitty AC installment.... ....

I think Ubisoft comes out with the most subpar games in general, they don't really ever try to excel.

But I think EA, being bigger, sets such a terrible precedent with all of the microtransactions, deluxe editions, and the concept that all you need to do is license a big IP and you'll get a free pass by reusing assets (particularly with their sports franchises). So I picked them. Their games are usually polished but absolutely stale and since EA is one of the biggest players in the industry they should be expected of a lot more. Not to mention they absolutely fucked up Bioware

Activision more money grabbing than EA? you have to be kidding me. I mean both are semi gross giant corporate shells that lack heart in development, BUT EA literally reskins all of their sports games year after year with very slight changes

i did not say they did more... all i said was that i dislike activision because they do it... the rest of your comment is saying what i did say at BOLD... really???

Not even close. Square-Enix doesn't slave labor their employees, demote them to cleaning toilets, lock up their employees, keep ex employees from getting health insurance or even new jobs or lock beloved IPs behind stupid gambling machines.

Maybe when SE cancels KH3 like Konami did Silent Hills (a game that was hyped the moon and spawned a bunch of copycat games of its fucking demo), you'll have a point. Even then, there's still no comparison. The top of the shit totem pole belongs to EA and Konami.