By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Why Are Feminists Evil?

WagnerPaiva said:

Modern feminism is against the women, it harms women, it allies with the very people that oppress them the most, like the Sharia Law Feminists, which want Sharia Law to be the norm, even knowing that Sharia Law is oppressive against women.
Leftists, globalists and most atheists love the feminists, do not think they are evil at all.

Edit: Just after writting it I remembered how Christppher Hitchens HATED feminism and had brilliant articles and rants against it. I take that off.

Most young girls get into feminism having no idea what are they getting into, most young boys do it to please the girls, they are not evil, but naive.
Puppets are never evil, when we say feminism and globalism is evil, we are talking about the puppeteers behind these Agendas, not the good hearted people that fall into it without knowing what they are really supporting.
A simple example is: in real life everyone can see that most men love women, almost worship them, almost fear them, would do anything to please them. In the Agenda they hate women and there should be a neverending gender wars.
The hidden objectives of the puppeteers are evil, destruction of family, sovereignty of the nations and the value of half of the mankind. Unspeakable evil disguised as the most noble of the causes: the protection of the beautiful and precious women.

Who are those puppeteers and why do they do those evil things? Just for the evil sake?



Around the Network

Its about not looking down or stereotyping women in the workplace, home or any enviroment, not about them having the same legal rights as men, which they currently already do... Sort of, cause the wife always gets the children after a divorce, like, wtf? what if the husband is the one with the steady job and emotional stability? I call bs. 



I do not consider myself to be a feminist, but I'm probably more feminist than 90% of the people on VGChartz.

 

Goodnightmoon said:
Because they are trying to destroy our white male privilegy and we are afraid as fuck of that, what if they start treating men as men has been treating women for ages? Terrorific                                     

You're right, nowadays you can't even hit your wife anymore. Sad.

FragileSurface said:
Jaicee said:

First off, let's clarify what I mean when I say that I'm a feminist. By that I mean that I count myself as an advocate for the rights of women and support the establishment of equal social relations between men and women and indeed people of all genders. I don't mean something other than that. (I have to say that because apparently lots of people confuse feminism for female supremacy.)

 

It sounds like you're a gender egaliatarian so why not call yourself that?  It's less confusing, more accurate and affects a broader range of people.  The term feminism needs to die.  If a feminist isn't willing to embrace the term 'gender-egalitarian'  then the don't truly want equality.

It's not confusing; it has been used for decades and everyone knows what it means.



CaptainExplosion said:
KLXVER said:

Ok, now we have gone from abusive husbands to a serial killer. Thats a bit different. Prison stopped him from killing people. Although he did escape a couple of times.

Exactly. The electric chair is why Bundy couldn't get out a third time.

And let me tell you about the late Angelina Napolitano. Her husband Pietro often beat and threatened her, to the point where in 1910 he stabbed her repeatedly with a pocket knife. After he later forced her into prostitution, even saying he'd kill her or their unborn child if she didn't make money from it, Angelina finally broke down and did society a favor: Gave Pietro four whacks with a nearby axe.

Sorry if I sound harsh, but it's become a fact that some people are just so much like Pietro Napolitano, and often even worse, that they DESERVE to die.

Well if you get to be known as a wife beater in jail, I dont think it will take long until you wish you were dead.



CaptainExplosion said:
KLXVER said:

Ok, now we have gone from abusive husbands to a serial killer. Thats a bit different. Prison stopped him from killing people. Although he did escape a couple of times.

Exactly. The electric chair is why Bundy couldn't get out a third time.

And let me tell you about the late Angelina Napolitano. Her husband Pietro often beat and threatened her, to the point where in 1910 he stabbed her repeatedly with a pocket knife. After he later forced her into prostitution, even saying he'd kill her or their unborn child if she didn't make money from it, Angelina finally broke down and did society a favor: Gave Pietro four whacks with a nearby axe.

Sorry if I sound harsh, but it's become a fact that some people are just so much like Pietro Napolitano, and often even worse, that they DESERVE to die.

Changing the social structure of undeveloped countries is different from criminality. You are talking about a criminal who wont care about laws. The topic is about regular law-abiding civilians whose cultural/social structure needs updating to modern times. 



Around the Network

Not all feminists are "evil", though there are those who are very exploitative (e.g. Anita Sarkeesian, listen-and-believers) or demand for special treatment under the guise of "wanting gender equality" (e.g. equality of outcome as opposed to equality of opportunity).

Captain_Yuri said:

This!

I don't think I have ever met a feminist that I actually liked. From my experience, they always seem to have some sort of a nonsense agenda and god forbid you like hot women. Heck look at Emma Watson. She calls herself a feminist but recently she did a photo shoot in front of a magazine where she was almost naked. And guess what? Feminists went crazy even saying that Emma Watson isn't a feminist and she just did the photo thing to pleasure men. And Emma Watson responded with "Feminism is about giving women choice and etc and not about what I do with my tits" and the nature of it all is just hilarious. And yes, this was trending pretty big on every social media site.

At the end of the day, I don't have much respect for a lot of the feminists out there. I want equailty for all but what I don't want is one gender taking priority over another. We have other terms for those who want equailty and those who want what's best for a specific gender.

I also noticed this kind of pattern frequently, where a bunch of feminists claim a self-proclaimed feminist isn't a true feminist and suffers from "internalized misogyny". Emma Watson is just one example of a feminist who got accused for not toeing the line. Taylor Swift got the same treatment when she didn't attend the Women's March, even though she Tweeted support for it.



SpokenTruth said:
Jpcc86 said:

Its about not looking down or stereotyping women in the workplace, home or any enviroment, not about them having the same legal rights as men, which they currently already do... Sort of, cause the wife always gets the children after a divorce, like, wtf? what if the husband is the one with the steady jon and emotional stability? I call bs. 

Because that is BS.  Mothers don't always get the child when contested.  However, fathers don't often fight for custody or you'll have a conservative judge that think it's a woman's job to raise kids and awards the mother regardless.

But thats a common mentality even today isnt it? And I think feminists should tackle that. And it barely even touches the subject.  



Veknoid_Outcast said:

I think the problem here is that folks are painting with broad strokes. All feminists are x or all feminists are y. It's entirely without nuance.

People subscribe to many different -isms and interpret them in different ways. Feminism for one person might be more militant than feminism for another. The same holds true for Catholicism, communism, liberalism, conservatism, etc.

It would be easy to look at a few extreme examples and indict an entire movement but that would also be grossly irresponsible. I think we should all endeavor to capture the complexity of political movements instead of hurling about stereotypes and generalizations.

naruball said:
setsunatenshi said:
Evil?

They can be wrong, it doesn't make them evil necessarily.

I think for many people describing themselves as feminists, I would say their intentions and heart are in a good place, but they don't realize the ideology that sits behind what they are declaring themselves to be, actually is sexist in itself and by conception bias against men (and in several forms of feminism against some women as well)

Then you have the professional victims like the Sarkeesian types that simply profit out of that buzzword and are actually destructive to the goals of equality that most of us would agree with. (not equality of results, but equality of opportunities)

I've been to two meetings of feminists and I was pleasantly surprised that though the hardcore ones were all about women's rights, the topics that they discussed and the reaction by most attendees were about men's rights too. They talked about how women are pressured to have a certain type of body and then female feminists would jump in and say, men don't have it much better since they're not allowed to show their feelings or they will be criticised by both men and women. They talked about words that they think are harmful, such as pussy or reference to "having balls" as a good thing, because both harm men and women. They brought up the need for paternity leave (though they said nothing about child custody).

My point is, how many times have people, who accuse feminist of all sorts of things, actually listened to them?  

I used to be a feminist-hater back in the days. Why? Because I, like so many, used the radicals to judge the entire movement. But then I took the time to do some research and discovered how little Iittle I actually knew about feminism. For starters it's a very, very broad definition and while most feminists seems to have about the same main goals, the ways to get there differs a lot between different groups of feminists. In Sweden, and I assume in many other countries as well, most political parties have their own groups of feminists, which of course helps to broaden the spectrum. In general, feminists on the left tend to be more positive towards quotations while those on the right tend to be more critical of such solutions. So political affiliation is important to take into consideration when talking feminism as [most] feminists don't live in a bubble unaffected by other ideologies.

Feminism only being for women and their rights and well-beings was another misconception of mine, and I have since then realised how feminism also benefits men and how it has been beneficial for me personally. I'm not a "manly man", I don't fit into the stereotypical man who loves sports and plays with cars and engines. I'm into home decoration, and it's nice to not get weird looks or be called fag because I like to spend money on fancy candles and pillows. It being as natural for women as for men to work and earn their own money is great for me, as it means I'm no longer expected to pay whenever I go out with a woman, and once I manage to catch a one I, not exactly born a leader, won't be expected to take on the traditional head of the family role. If me and my partner have children and later break up it won't be a piece of cake for her to take the kids away from me, like it used to be. The idea that it's more natural for the mother to take care of the kids is dying and with that comes more responsibilites for us men, but it also strenghens our rights to be with our children. It's also becoming more normal for men to stay home from work to spend time with their newborn child.

 

I've also had some experience with norm criticism, which led to another awakening as I was sure that norm criticism was a tool of Satan. But it wasn't at all the one-sided anti-white male circle jerk I had expected. In fact, we spent a lot of time discussing the demonisation of men and how it's more "ok" to have blacks make fun of whites than the other way around and whether that should be seen as acceptable or not. And for the record most participants were women, the lecturer was a woman and despite that me and the other guys could voice our opinions without getting killed.

 

About the relevancy of feminism today, I definitely think it's still needed and will be for the foreseeable future. We still have issues with women getting paid less in general (in Sweden at least), men's violence against women is still a huge problem and men are still greatly overrepresented when it comes to sexual harrassment and rape. Also, feminism today often includes standing up for LGTB rights, amongst other topics.

I also view feminism as the best bet for men fighting for their rights, and I think men's situations will get more and more publicity as more men join the movement. I know there are alternatives to feminism but I honestly view those as half-assed attempts at best.

 

There's a comic that I feel nails the problem with men's issues not getting enough publicity. Unfortunately I don't have a scan of it (and it would probably be illegal to post it anyway) but the dialogue, roughly translated by moi, goes something like this:

 

Man: Did you know it's the International Men's Day today? Nope, of course you didn't because not a single publication has written about it. There's a lot of ruckus on Women's Day but on Men's Day everyone becomes quiet.

Where are the articles about destructive machoculture and how it harms young boys? Where's the debate regarding high suicide rates, low school results and how men are oppressed in custody disputes, huh?

Woman: Absolutely! You should go out and protest or make articles about it. We need men's perspective on the male role.

The man glares at her.

Man: Hey, I'm not the feminist here. Why don't you write about it?

 

I know it's just my personal experience but too often have I seen this mentality amongst men and I find that sad, because there are issues that deserves more attention. It's becoming increasingly difficult for men to work in preschools because of pedophilia and how men are under constant surveillance simply for being men, and it's getting to the point where men just won't bother with those jobs because of the risk of being falsely accused of pedophilia. There's still a certain taboo regarding violence against men in relationships, talking about men's feelings in general, etc.



Fasc-ism, Commun-ism, Fundamental-ism, Rac-ism... Femin-ism.

I rest my case.



Hunting Season is done...

Feminism isn't about women any more. it is just a bunch of women with sand in their vaginas being mad about random shit.

The original femenists hate their guts.