Areym said:
Azuren said: While I'm absolutely sure this game is deserving of a 96, I feel a lot of people are giving it perfect scores for fear of fan retaliation. I wish they would more honestly address everything rather than just fangasm about Zelda. |
A good chunk of the reviews (well, the veridicts, I can't read all of those reviews fully) are giving it high praise because of the significant change it brings to the Zelda formula (at least in terms of design, not story) and that it feels like the franchise its reinventing itself. It's still being reviewed as a great open world experience but the "masterpiece" status is being focused more on how to changes the franchise going forward. I can see reviewers being reluctant about giving it lower scores (even if it's just 5 or 10 less) but I don't think it takes away from the game just being fantastic or it should completely undermine its achievement
|
I just feel that any criticism for the game should disqualify it of the perfect score many sites are giving it (and from what I hear, the Motion controls would have been better off not included). I dunno, when I see a perfect score, I expect a perfect game.
That aside, this is currently the highest reviewed game of Eighth Generation. And anything MC95+ warrants a purchase. I'm not denying it's amazing direction or anything, as I've been a fan since it's unveiling. I just feel like a game like this should get honest scores based on the game itself and not "OH FUCK IT'S A CONSOLE ZELDA".