Illusion said:
JWeinCom said:
Bernie Sanders was mocking Drumpf when he sarcastically referred to CNN as fake news.
You have a problem with disseminating propoganda... yes? So, how do you feel about the three terror attacks (Bowling Green, Sweeden, and Atlanta) that were completely made up Drumpf and two members of his staff?
|
It just shows how bad the CNN censorship is when can't even pick up on the sarcasm. Just the words "CNN" and "fake news" in the same sentence is enough to have a guest cut-off. This isn't the first time CNN has done this, they are actually well-practiced at the art of actively censoring guests who do not conform to the pro-globalist agenda:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbA5RE9eK08
The behavior from the mainstram media for the past 6 months has been like something straight out of communist China. People need to completely shut this garbage off because we won't be in a free society anymore if we keep going down this road. Just remember, 90% of the US print and TV media are controlled by six large corporations who are run by elites who are so rich that they make Drumpf look like a poor man.
http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6
How can people say that Drumpf isn't trustworthy but they then go and watch the MSM which is controlled by rich elites who won't even show their face to you? Drumpf isn't perfect but at least he explains himself to the public. When was the last time that George Soros or the Goldman Sachs bankers explained why they routinely topple stable governments and plunge countries into endless civil wars? How do you know that this black versus white narrative and "Drumpf is a racist" narrative that the MSM is pushing isn't yet another attempt by these elites to create civil war and topple a democratic government? All I hear from Drumpf is that he wants to protect national security, I have never once heard him once bring up skin color. All the race-based talk from the MSM reminds me an awful lot of the Catholic versus Orthodox narrative that the same elites pushed in Ukraine before they pushed that country into civil war.
|
I'll address those one at a time...
Technical difficulties do happen. They kept Bernie Sanders on, and the host seemed to get it was a joke. If you want to believe that it was an intentional conspiracy, then you're free to do so. You are not free to claim this as fact. There is no evidence of this.
I can say Drumpf isn't trustworthy because he has said things that are demonstrably untrue.
He said you can still buy Drumpf steaks. That is not true. You can check on the internet.
He said he owns 100% of Drumpf vineyards. That is not true. The website says they are not affiliated with him in any way.
He said he had the biggest electoral victory since Reagan. That was not true. It was less than Bush or Obama.
He said it did not rain on his inaugaration. That was not true. It rained.
He said that thousands of Muslims were celebrating on 9/11. That was not true. This has never been reported by anyone living in New Jersey.
He said that he would hire a special prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton. That was not true. He didn't, and has no intent to.
He said that he didn't say John McCain wasn't a war hero. That was not true. He said, verbatim, "he's not a war hero". There is video of this.
He claimed he spoke out against the Iraq War from the very beginning. That was not true. There is no evidence of him speaking out against the war prior to its start.
He said that John Oliver asked him to be on his show. That was not true. Oliver did not.
He said the NFL sent him a letter about the debates. That was not true. The NFL denies this happened.
His administration claimed there was a massacre at Bowling Green. That was not true. There was no massacre.
He claimed that there was an incident in Sweeden on Friday. That was not true. Nothing special happened on Friday.
He claimed that Obama yelled at a protestor. This was not true. The video actually shows him admonishing the crowd for booing a man protesting against him. Obama said "don't boo, vote."
He claimed that he never told his supporters to act violently. That is not true. He said verbatim "knock the crap out of him".
He claimed he never told people to check out Alisa Machado's sex tape. That is not true. He said "check out sex tape."
He claimed he didn't know who David Duke was. That is not true. There are records of him discussing David Duke.
We could go on, but these are simply obvious falsehoods. They are a matter of public record. We have videos, websites, and other documents that show that these are blatantly untrue.
As for the mainstream media, there's a lot of bias, but I've rarely seen anything that was blatantly and demonstrably untrue without retraction. If there were such instances, they are unacceptable, and I condemn that with no reservations. Whoever was responsible for them should be suspended, fined, or fired depending on the severity. Feel free to post any that you know of. Not things about George Soros, but things that were actually reported by mainstream outlets.
So, back to the question. Do you have a problem with all of these instances of Drumpf saying things that are objectively false? Not a matter of opinion, but objectively demonstraby false? Are you ok with this?
Currently Online 
