You stupid? With 1-2 Switch bitches will be flocking to you for free! Spend those $10 on booze!

It looks state of the art. Its a single player game, and supposedly has like 70hours? of gameplay in it.

Yes its fair its 60$.

When I saw the title of this thread I was sure it was made as a parody thread.

So it was a parody thread... and your compairing the 60$ price tag of 1,2,Switch to  Horizon Zero dawn.

Lmao is all I can say.

Lol literally at the phrase "1-2 Switch bitches"! 😄

You're the one trying to say somebody else is 'trying to stay relevant' on a video game forum and also trying to take a jab at Nintendo just because Rol criticized a Sony game. 

But I imagine you're just gonna keep trying to go back and forth with this so i'm just gonna end it here and say k think what you want. 

edit: Lmao btw, you can try to lie and say that I 'started an argument' all you want if that makes you feel better, but everyone that reads this thread and sees your posts already knows the truth. You're the one that came into this thread throwing insults at the one who made this thread and taking jabs at Nintendo just because someone criticized a Sony game. 

You mean "1-2-Bitch", as in the amount of bitches you'll be getting and switching between. 

This was certainly an interesting read. I'm mildly entertained this morning. :)

Quality over Quanity. If the game is good than $60 is just fine. It's a little to early to say if corners were cut in Hozizon since it's not out yet, but from what I've seen and heard seems like it's got a great crafting system and large map, and deverse foes to tackle, along with a good story naritive, and gameplay.

Some examples as of late below:

++ Overwatch: Solid Deep MP, no SP (worth $60)

- Evolve: No SP, Shallow MP (not worth $60)

- Street figter No SP, Shallow MP, No Arcade Mode (not worth $60)

-- The Order 1886: Bad Bad AI, example of to short,  (NOT worth $60 just about a rent)

++Inside: Perfect game play, animation, story, level design, not a long game but does'nt matter cuz it's almost perfect. (worth $60 even though it was $20)

It's all relative.

As far as playing a female protagonist, ya that's just you most don't give a shit, unless your under 10 years old then you really should'nt be playing this game anyway.

$60 is fine for Horizon, that's the standard price, and thank god, otherwise we would be spending $100 dollars for open world games like the Witcher

Just curious..would you happen to be a millennial?

I've pre ordered it so speaking only for myself I think it's worth it.

BTW GTA V isn't worth $60. It's worth at least $200. Play it regularly almost 3 years later.

So is less than $60.00 the price we should pay for a game that doesn't include an online multiplayer component? Inversely, should we be charged more than $60 for games that are online only? I mean, The Witcher III doesn't have online multiplayer but I managed 378 hours of play time before finishing it. I think this line of thinking is silly. Should games be priced by length and content? Honestly, with add-ons and DLC this is sort of already happening. But happens with a game like (again) The Witcher III can take months to finish. How should such a game be priced?

From reading the OP's posts in the past he didn't even need to put that in for anyone to know this to be true.