Selling ~14M-15M more than the competition, especially when 2nd is at 86M+, isn't exactly pulverizing.  If PS4 only ends up that far ahead of the XBO, which it won't, it definitely didn't pulverize it.

As a person who actually enjoyed Haze, I strongly disagree. Which really proves the main point. Just because you don't like something, doesn't mean others won't. People just need to stop making poor excuses for MS. They're obviously spending less on Xbox. It's just that simple. They didn't want to anymore money for developing a game that may have needed another 6 months to a year to polish.

This thread is about why Microsoft doesn't tell its hardware numbers, and that includes another side to the coin. And sure, what you said can happen - and then the owner shows up in the monthly active user base that Microsoft seems to care more about. And then they disappear again once the game that activated them isn't new anymore. Monthly active users gives a better indication of the general vitality of a console. And just to clear this up: I don't think hardware numbers aren't important because obviously they are, but I just don't think they're a very good indicator either.

So then do you know the number of monthly active users on Xbox? What's it at? I'm pretty sure that even with MAU they've been vague, instead saying how it improved % wise over the year before with no actual figures for how many MAU to draw from. My memory is honestly a little fuzzy though. So do you know?

I have no idea, I haven't been following the situation because I don't particularly care about the details. I'm sure the numbers are healthy, but they should be far from Sony's.

Sorry, but this is BS. If Xbox was doing better than PlayStation, they'd probably release numbers all the time.

Spencer engages in incest confirmed!

Dem MILFs...