Every console maker is losing out on money from their games not being on other systems. I would love to have one console for all my gaming needs, but that probably wont happen anytime soon.

Nintendo don't need to follow that path. Sticking to their software plans would be more than enough.

Firstly, my logic is that the games that did not sell the Wii U, aren't going to sell Switch either. I could have imagined Nintendo releasing Mario Kart 9 and port 8 later.

Content is one of the problems: Mario Kart 8 have a few non-Mario characters, and Deluxe even had the squid kids on top of everything else. I don't consoder Mario Kart as an "all stars" game.

Hovering and driving underwater: obvious gimmick to "surprise" the player. They go on to change how you handle the vehicle in the middle of the game, basically shoving the gimmick up your ass without giving you the option to drive the way you want to. If it was different routes in question, normal and alternative, this could even be fun. But no.

Online: so far we know nothing about it on deluxe, but not being able to choose your favourite tracks suck. You have only three tracks to vote from at a time.

Nintendo the most, since they have the smallest userbase in the console hardware market. The only way it would work, as I said, is if Nintendo had a good share of 3rd party support.

Well lets see how the Switch does. If its another WiiU, then Ill be on your side of things.

What?

Think before saying something when it comes to business, something that you may not have knowledge... That would be a suicide!

No one gurantees that Nintendo software would sell as much as  is needed to match the profits of Nintendo as a hardware maker!

Would nintendo care to make as many games for other platforms, as they create for their own products?

Only Third party would be a could move as a last resort,  i.e in case that Nintendo burns their huge reserves that they have in the banks by having constant financial flops... Nintendo lost money first time with 3DS in 2011, because of the urgent excessive price drop which skyrocketed the sales but 3D effect royalties cost them, then the hardware became profitable with 3DS XL launching at 199$ in 2012! After that they lost money in 2012 and 2013 owing to wii u tablet controller cost+combined with low sales, not amortizing the expenses for research and distirbution... They haven't lose money any other time in their long history and  these  losses were insignificant! They will sell switch on profit from the beginning, they want their core business to return to financial state of 6th gen when with the 104m ( gc+gba ) piece of hardware sold, they earned more than their closest competitor which had way higher hardware and software sales, that thanks to first party software sales.

Anyway, it's better to sell your software in other hardware than yours? it's better to share the money with the manufacturer of hardware, than to get full money by selling your software on your own hardware? ( excluding stores allotment)

Also, is it better to be deprieved of the money from the accessories you sell for your own console?

hahah

Nintendo was 4th in money making of software developers  in 2016,  in their worst market, the, uk, that with few releases and the durability of the older titles, with aging products ( okay there were pokemon ) , if you add the gains from hardware, you probably get Nintendo above ubisoft and activizion, perhaps ea too...

In an nutshell, becoming only third party would be an economic matter, not a sales one! Nintendo  lost just 200m with wii u, they have 5b cash and so many other assets liquid or not... 

P.s

 keep dreaming of a Nintendo third party guys... Now that they expanded successfully to mobile, and we wait for movies and theme parks venture... Forget it! Buy their non traditional games on smartphones...

Lol 

You quashed my argument dont think so 

Not really. What Nintendo would lose as a 3rd party, is money made of hardware and accessory sales. They'd also lose royalties coming from third party game sales on Nintendo hardware, and also profit made from their own software would be smaller because of Nintendo would need to pay royalties for every game thay'd sell on other platforms.

Nobody guarantees anything. Not even Nintendo guarantees the Switch will sell well, or have at least 5 years of support. The best we can use to measure probability is statistics.

I've already posted several times that, statistically, selling twice as much software on a platform with 5 times the userbase is not such an unrealistic idea, and that a doubling of Nintendo's software sales would cover any costs from hardware or licensing.

If Nintendo do what you say, and only move 3rd party once the assets have dried up, then they will have made the same mistakes that Sega did. Good luck keeping Nintendo development talent on board with a bankrupt company looking to make a few quick gains. This would damage Nintendo's reputation immeasurably.

Okay, I need to mention this a 6th time, but I have already addressed this argument using statistics. Yes, that includes hardware costs, and licensing costs (royalties are for copyrights).