By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - The Moderator Thread

Ka-pi96 said:
Flilix said:

I also don't get why this post didn't get moderated:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8388226

He's defending neo-nazis here.

Why exactly should that be moderated? He's not even defending neo-nazis, merely asking if the OP thinks it's ok to hate on them simply because of their label.

And he's got a damn good point too! If you're trying to say all discrimination is bad then you can't throw in a (except for this group which I hate) otherwise you're just a massive hypocrite.

The question doesn't make much sense, because it's asking if we'd be pre-judiced towards neo-Nazis, but if they're openly acknowldedging that they're a neo-Nazi, isn't that their whole goal? For us to know it, and get a certain reaction out of them?



Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
Green098 said:

No problem, thanks for understanding just wanted to make sure there were no hard feelings. I still broke the rules so I understand why I should and have been warned, it'll help so I make sure not to do so in the future at risk of more bigger consequences.

You got warned because of personal beef between Raven and Kerotan. Several weeks ago Raven had to kick Kerotan from the VGC discord channel and he is tired of Kerotan's complaints. Kerotan's thread needed to be locked, so Raven decided to throw a Kerotan a bone by taking action against someone else as well, all in hopes that Kerotan might shut up. You just happened to be the first person to post in Kerotan's thread.

Now Raven only needs to add a note to your moderation history that the warning doesn't count. This can done in secret, so the official version will always be that Kerotan got his will and you were legitimately warned for your post. And of course you will have to cite the official version in case that somebody asks.

I'd appreciate it if you didn't comment on things that you have no idea about, as you're not a moderator. Green accused another user of being a troll directly, which is something that's against the rules. I can either choose to ignore it and get questioned about it, or follow the site's own rules on the subject and still get questioned about it. There is no conspiracy, as I am probably the last person willing to throw Kerotan a bone for anything.



RolStoppable said:
Miguel_Zorro said:

I've locked that thread.

Quite redundant since it has been inactive for about two weeks now. What I really want is that such threads get locked a lot sooner in the future and that the moderation might extend beyond merely locking the thread, although that has to be decided on a case by case basis.

Related, I'd like that the mod team acts when I make them aware of such threads. I don't want to be ignored.

I WON'T BE IGNORED



Ka-pi96 said:
Flilix said:

I also don't get why this post didn't get moderated:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8388226

He's defending neo-nazis here.

Why exactly should that be moderated? He's not even defending neo-nazis, merely asking if the OP thinks it's ok to hate on them simply because of their label.

And he's got a damn good point too! If you're trying to say all discrimination is bad then you can't throw in a (except for this group which I hate) otherwise you're just a massive hypocrite.

He's obviously insinuating that neo-nazis should be respected.

And there is a very big difference between what neo-nazis are doing and what the OP was doing. Neo-nazis discriminate people because of e.g. their skin colour or their ethnicity. This is bad because a) people can't choose their skin colour or ethnicity, b) people aren't doing any harm by having the 'wrong' skin colour or ethnicity. The OP on the other hand, is just being disrespectful towards a group of people who support the killing of millions of people and who encourage hate and racism.



Ryuu96 said:
vivster said:
Now that some time has passed, has the deliberation of the mod team concluded on whether they support the slaughter of million of Jews, Roma and politcal prisoners or not?
I for one don't think it's a difficult position to discuss but I gave the mod team some time.

Context
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=229947
moderated but not banned

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8443923
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8448149
reported but not moderated

Bonus:
Motivational quotes
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/inaction

We've made it clear to Alex that Holocaust denial is something we won't tolerate, if he brings it up again he will be met with harsh bans.

You may have to look up again what "not tolerated" means. Remember when I posted a naked butt for 20 minutes and then censored it myself after seeing my mistake? I got an instant ban for that. That other guy thinks all Jews should be slaughtered, shows no remorse and just gets a slap on the wrist?

For the sake of consistency you may want to rethink that moderation decision. Here, I'll make it easier for you.

"I think all Nintendo fans should die" = 30 day ban

"I think all Jews should die and Hitler was an OK guy and I fully support him and everything the nazis did." = ???



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Around the Network
Ka-pi96 said:
vivster said:

You may have to look up again what "not tolerated" means. Remember when I posted a naked butt for 20 minutes and then censored it myself after seeing my mistake? I got an instant ban for that. That other guy thinks all Jews should be slaughtered, shows no remorse and just gets a slap on the wrist?

For the sake of consistency you may want to rethink that moderation decision. Here, I'll make it easier for you.

"I think all Nintendo fans should die" = 30 day ban

"I think all Jews should die and Hitler was an OK guy and I fully support him and everything the nazis did." = ???

I think you're blowing it a bit out of proportion there...

He never said he thought all Jews should be slaughtered or that he supports everything the nazis did. If he actually thought that then he wouldn't need to deny that the holocaust happened because he'd be proud of it or something. He's pretending the terrible stuff they did never happened in order to justify his support, rather than supporting them because of the terrible stuff they did.

Well, I'm sure if he's denying the Holocaust because of that, or if he knows that accepting the Holocaust will mean that a large number of people won't accept his ideology, so he has to whitewash it in order to make it more appealing.



You know, I guess the mods are unpaid, so this may be asking a bit too much, but have you guys ever thought of doing community events? I have no ideas in particular, unfortunately, but maybe having something new once a month or so could help spice things up.



CGI-Quality said:
VGPolyglot said:
You know, I guess the mods are unpaid, so this may be asking a bit too much, but have you guys ever thought of doing community events? I have no ideas in particular, unfortunately, but maybe having something new once a month or so could help spice things up.

I have (in the form of hosted topics). I'll be doing a bit more in the Fall (particularly to strengthen the PC community here), but Axum and Miguel come up with ideas for events and the like quite often. 

Oh, I don't remember your hosted topics to be honest! I guess Axum does do the Most Wanted, and Miguel does make some threads himself too.



Miguel_Zorro said:

I've locked that thread.

No, you haven't. I can still post in it.



RolStoppable said:

Adding to the mod team's to-do list, I am still waiting for an explanation why this thread is defensible material for discussion:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=229763

Me and Miguel actually discussed this and I was going to lock it up, but it must have slipped my mind.

Kerotan said:
To follow on from RolStoppable's queries I'd like to ask why people aren't get moderated for pointing out a thread is a troll thread like he just said. This ir against the rules. There is a report feature for a reason. I'm sure you have your hands full with Rol and vivster but when you get to the bottom of all that get back to me!

When a thread is borderline trolling, or someone is being a dick and baiting or whatever, we will always have an influx of people callng out the OP or whoever made a silly comment. I'm sure I've explained this to you before, but there is a significant level of flexibility in the rule set where we can use common sense to hand out punishments for shitty behaviour. 

Bunch of people calling a poor thread a troll thread, when it's been clearly aimed at getting a reaction, isn't going to get them moderated.

Kerotan said:
On the back seat modding issue. It's been getting out of hand recently. People talk like they are mods openly in threads. Is this a free for all now or what?

This would go on a case by case situation, again with the mod team discussing whatever has been said and coming to an agreement on if it's a) backseat moderation and worthy of us looking closer at it or b) worthwhile and helpful to a users progress on the site.

Miguel_Zorro said:

I've locked that thread.

Sorry about that