I should become more toxic if i read that correctly

/in before thread ban

@CGI-Quality Not sure if you accidentally referenced the wrong post in your ban note for Klaudkill, he edited it after the initial infraction, or I've missed something in my morning stupor.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9039301

This is the post he got banned for: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9039331

Somehow he got unbanned after 2 hours, so the reinstated ban references the wrong post.

The above quote about sums it up. Vgchartz needs a rule against pretending to be neutral in the OP, and then going full blown argument mode in the rest of the thread. Had the OP just said "This is B.S.! Transgender person has been discriminated against!" in the OP, then the thread would be fine. Granted, his opinion is wrong and a ridiculous one. Scratch that. It's not an opinion. It's a factually false belief. You can't discriminate against a person who is biologically still a man in this context, and in this specific situation. 

BTW I'm against people being called Trolls or the whole idea of trolling in general. It often leads to people getting banned for ridiculous reasons. Before I came here I made a thread in some other forums arguing that 3DS was infinitely better than Vita. I was open and honest in the OP that I thought Vita was terrible, and on the verge of death, while 3DS was amazing. Vita fans came into the thread, and tried arguing everything on the planet that Vita was superior to 3DS. I never insulted anybody, but was insulted multiple times, and called a troll in the thread. I kept getting accused of not wanted a genuine discussion, simply because I wouldn't bend to the ridiculous arguments being presented in favor of Vita being better. Eventually they issued me a 5 day ban, and I left the forums for good to come here. In hindsight I was beyond absolutely correct. Vita died completely in 2013, while 3DS flourished. Anybody saying Vita is better than 3DS in this day and age should be laughed at. 

TL/DR: People should never be moderated for their opinions/false beliefs, and accusing someone of being a troll basically amounts to a psychological attack. 

P.S. The correct way to handle that thread is to show how OP's idea is blatantly false, and contradictory. Then, everytime he posts a new thread, post linking to all his old threads where he's been proven wrong time and time again. This should be enough to keep people from being baited into arguing with him, that don't want to argue with him. 

Edit: You know what? Nope. OP's thread should be locked on account of being sexist, because it flat out is. It should be locked just as quickly as any thread stating that "Negroes are inferior to White Men, and deserve to be enslaved!". OP should be banned for a month for his ridiculous and factually wrong beliefs. 

In response to Rol's above post.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9015351

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9015410

The mod team is well acquainted with the behavior of o_O.Q, including very recently, so this is indeed a case that the team should be looking at.

Aaah. Thank you.

Aaaah again. Thanks for the explanation.

Going by the rules, Rol should get a 14 day ban for heavy backseat moderating.

The appropriate course of action is not up for you to decide.

You can make suggestions, but you don't get to tell the mod team in it's entirety what to do, we don't have to do a thing.

Instead you can be constructive in other ways, let us know about discrepancies, let us know if something is unfair, but don't start dictating terms and conditions.

I dont get why everyone focus lies with the irrevant part or rols posts, then again that maybe the only bad part of his post thus why some love to jump on it.

His initial assesment is valid, but it looks like he is talking in a room full of people with earplugs