By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fatslob-:O said:
VGPolyglot said:

I didn't character assassinate you, I merely took your own posts and linked them here.

But you did try to character assassinate me by painting me as a racist by trying to implicate that I thought that different human populations were different species but what's more is that you further made jumps in your logic by cherry picking evidence that I also further implicated that these "human species" were inferior to one another even though my question had made NO comparison whatsoever at ALL ... 

You practically twisted my question into something that it wasn't ... 

I wonder where your snowman has gone .



Around the Network
Oneeee-Chan!!! said:

I wonder where your snowman has gone .

It got boring plus Spring is coming up so the holiday season is over ... 



Oneeee-Chan!!! said:
fatslob-:O said:

But you did try to character assassinate me by painting me as a racist by trying to implicate that I thought that different human populations were different species but what's more is that you further made jumps in your logic by cherry picking evidence that I also further implicated that these "human species" were inferior to one another even though my question had made NO comparison whatsoever at ALL ... 

You practically twisted my question into something that it wasn't ... 

I wonder where your snowman has gone .

He melted :p Xd 



This is great fatslob you are gonna get cherrypicked and taken out of context because of implied racism



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

fatslob-:O said:
VGPolyglot said:

Do you want me to dig up more of your posts?

Go ahead ... 

Well, here are some examples, one is you wanting the alt-right to fund genetics because you don't like the results. Also, you dispute the claim that different species cannot reproduce, implying that humans are multiple species.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8735132

However, of course you then say that you were partially joking, but then imply that you were also partially serious, which gives you a convenient escape when people question your claim. So, you can always just make claims like that then backtrack and say that you were joking.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8735199

I also asked you in that thread if you consider certain races inferior to others, but you refused to answer that, because you were afraid of getting banned for your response.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8728952

Here you make the implication that Sub-Saharan Africa is poorer because they are genetically inferior, and make reference to people winning the "genetic lottery", so being lucky for being born into what you consider to be superior races.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8305387

Another post linking race to contributions to society.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8304300

Someone responds that living conditions and culture shapes contributions to history much more than race, but you then say that it is race itself that these derive from.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8304409

You make the clear-cut case here that you consider whites and East Asians as more intelligent than blacks.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8304427

And here you said you don't care if the "facts" make you a white supremacist, yet now you're trying to dispute my assertions that you're racist, presumably because you realized that you can be banned for being racist here.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8304435

 

So, is that enough evidence? Or are you going to reject/deny all of that too?



Around the Network
kirby007 said:
This is great fatslob you are gonna get cherrypicked and taken out of context because of implied racism

More explicit than implied.



VGPolyglot said:
kirby007 said:
This is great fatslob you are gonna get cherrypicked and taken out of context because of implied racism

More explicit than implied.

Seeing as it is you who brought issue up it looks like a personal vendetta.. cause these links dont prove him being a racist just that you are baiting him and trying to label him and that you fail to recognise when something is actual racism



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

kirby007 said:
VGPolyglot said:

More explicit than implied.

Seeing as it is you who brought issue up it looks like a personal vendetta.. cause these links dont prove him being a racist just that you are baiting him and trying to label him and that you fail to recognise when something is actual racism

Kirby, you're always trying to be purposefully contrarian to get a rise out of people.



VGPolyglot said:
kirby007 said:

Seeing as it is you who brought issue up it looks like a personal vendetta.. cause these links dont prove him being a racist just that you are baiting him and trying to label him and that you fail to recognise when something is actual racism

Kirby, you're always trying to be purposefully contrarian to get a rise out of people.

If i'd be a contrarian i wouldnt agree with fatslob or is your view the only view allowed?



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

kirby007 said:
VGPolyglot said:

Kirby, you're always trying to be purposefully contrarian to get a rise out of people.

If i'd be a contrarian i wouldnt agree with fatslob or is your view the only view allowed?

Well, I'm not the one who decides what's allowed an what's not, the moderators do.