mZuzek said:
Except, he said that in reference to a highly wrong prediction thread..? |
He was calling people sexists in another thread when they weren't. I think that some people are fixating on the wrong part of the mod note.
"can't see the forest for the trees." .
mZuzek said:
Except, he said that in reference to a highly wrong prediction thread..? |
The OP was humble enough to admit that he was wrong and GNM thought it was a good idea to shit on him in spite of his admittance.
And what Aeolus just said, too. GNM's problem was not limited to only Nintendo discussions. He simply could not handle dissent, frequently lashing out at other people for having the "wrong" opinions and slapping negative labels.
CGI-Quality said:
quickrick was Moderated for Trolling. |
Not really. i was banned because carl didn't like my opinion about ps3 winning the generation easily if it launched at 399$. He thought it was ignorant/stupid, i didn't see his logic, so he banned me. He started talking about people are idiots( basically me). i'm not gonna complain about it, what difference does it make there are much worse mods out there, and since you're so laid back i thought that i wouldn't get banned as long as i didn't break the rules which i didn't. No mod ever gave me a warning for trolling before the ban.
Last edited by quickrick - on 17 January 2018
quickrick said:
Not really. i was banned because carl didn't like my opinion about ps3 winning the generation easily, if it launched at 399$. He thought it was ignorant/stupid, i didn't see his logic, so he banned me. started talking about people are idiots( basically me). i'm not gonna complain about it, what difference does it make there are much worse mods out there, and since you're so laid back i thought that i wouldn't get banned as long as i didn't break the rules which i didn't. |
Which post was it?
Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!
Check out my Twitch Channel!:
www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames
Azuren said:
Which post was it? |
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=234000&page=31#7 you can scroll through the page, and see why i got banned.
Last edited by quickrick - on 17 January 2018
mZuzek said:
Yeah, sure. As I said he did deserve a permaban at some point, I just think the post used for it wasn't a good choice, that's all. |
No, you have a point. It was more of a series of posts that did him in instead of a single comment.
Carl2291 said:
I was that one kid who didn't understand why idiots were allowed to run free. |
CGI-Quality said:
You can be Banned without a Warning, depending on the severity of the offense and the history. You were banned for Trolling (and could have even been Banned for Flaming). |
In regard's to flaming. that comment about about he was the one kid that who didn't understand why idiots were allowed to run free, was obviously a personal insult toward me, that's why i posted that.
I wonder if mods have a script that checks for new users with female gender to early detect spambots.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
Ya Carl had every right to ban quickrick. Giving his continued post history behaviour I do not imagine he learned his lesson.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
