Policy lynches are fine if that person will fucking grab all the scumtension of the game and will prevent scumhunting.

I might need to reread the whole thread again. I got confused on whats happening.

Nothing really, people being salty people about salty things, including me

This is your one and only post in the game so far. While I appreciate you using it to talk about me, would you care to share some insights on your vote?

The way I see policy lynches get the ball rolling and I believe it did just that here. I'm fully intent on getting a lynch toDay because from a mod perspective last game that's the big flaw that I saw in Town's play. It doesn't have to be zero at all cost but right now I'm comfortable with that vote. Should someone trigger my scumdar during the course of the Day, I'll be pushing for them instead. Stefl could fit that bill but first I'd like to figure what kind of role could possibly make a guy who's hosted many games say "I don't know how to play this."

*** Side note *** : How fucking awesome was Rogue One? I loved it to pieces!

That's the thing, mr.p didn't do jack shit last game when pressured, he thought a claim and he is safe. That is not how the game goes, either you try to be town or you just might as well get discarded day 1.

Shouldn't you be happy Mr. P handed you the game on a platter or do you hate bad town play that much that you don't care it benefited you?

Also, follow up question, don't you agree that Mr. P played good games outside the last one?

TBH I think everyone needs to take a chill pill 'cause everything is escalating quickly; 

Okay so there are 15 players playing in total. Similar to the last game so I believe it's reasonable to believe that there are 3 mafiosi just like last game. However in this game, I don't think there is a 3rd party though any other thoughts on that apart from what has already been discussed?

I have a slight town read on stefl...I take his openness and slight role hints could mean that he's town. Also I'm highly suspicious of anyone voting for zero, since I'm getting no scummy vibes from him to be honest.

I hate that the victory felt empty to me, no schemes and shit required, just a townie that was bad as fuck.

I didn't see any special play from him yet, so I'd just say he played okay.

I just don't want to have a townie fucking simply not care, if he at least showed some care, even when he is under pressure, great. But he literally lost by losing himself, without any strategy behind it.

See, that is what I wanted to see, this is more constructive than any fucking post last game, ez, lets keep at that

could be up to 4 with that amount of players in the game, since it would be quite close to 1on3

1.  I don't know if you really want us to play this game like we're correcting last game's mistakes, because the biggest one is "lynch the guy who loses his shit on Day 1". 

2.  Please explain what a policy lynch is and why my vote on you is a policy lynch vote. 

3.  Also, you should re-read my post.  I acknowledged that your reply to trucks was only joking back, but even as a joke the weird stuff like quoting one person twice instead of quoting two people, and voting everyone you were trying to reply to except the guy you quoted twice, is bizarre enough to draw negative attention to me.  If that is supposed to be a joke, I don't get the joke.  Otherwise, if you're this sloppy now, why should I expect incisive, thoughtful analysis later? 

Once that negative attention was on you, I noticed that your later posts, which you acknowledge were serious, were full of terrible reasoning and just wrong information.  (First one here.  I was among the first and strongest people on his lynch, and that was certainly my first game with him, and I never did read his prior games.  And then you say you "expected no less" of Trucks when you apparently didn't expect his vote to be serious and also guessed wrong at his reasons for doing so.)

4.  What did I tell you to do, and how is it the same as what got Mr.P lynched?