Would you say it's less likely for lynches in later rounds to go down the same way?

When multiple people say the same thing outside of a current game, it's sound logic.

I didn't ask you to judge me as town.

Nobody followed spurge/you, Stefl, or darwin on any lynch last game. miz voted Mr.P, and with Mr.P voting himself scum was able to cast the other 3 votes needed to lynch him. So yes, you're painting a false narrative.

I already did chastise Trucks for starting off with a policy lynch, even though I agree it's a fair one. I would rather see it as a last resort like a lurker lynch though.

I also pointed out that Stefl's vote could be a good way to cause Mr.P to fall back into the same anti-town behavior of last game. And as for letting his slip slide, you know I voted him right?

Stefl would not be confused by the Jester role. We saw it as recently as Round 70, and he helped lynch the Jester. Of course the role usually forbids the player from claiming Jester, so Stefl can't do much about it if that is the case.

You missed spurge's vote for zero, right after prof's.

Who started this anyway? It should be L1, short for Lynch-1, as in 1 vote away from lynch.

"Put your votes on a separate line and in bold, if not in this format they will not be counted."

I may have counted his first vote in the history, but I never added it to the table. If he wants to make it official he needs to abide by the rule.

Then Trucks vote doesn't count!

No, he wouldn't.. but I'm guessing it is some other neutral role which has a more confusing win condition or effect, which in either case would still mean he's not town so his lynch wouldn't negatively effect town

I'm probably reading too much into his post and burst though :/

You missed my vote though D:

not at all, Fuuka Yamagishi

Also, platina, really, stop with the second party speculation, either you try to get me down as scum or stop it completely.