By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - [Update] CIA & FBI Report: Russia did things to help get Trump elected

Wikileaks "rigged" the rigged election to make it un-rigged.

Strange that the liberal demographic now want corruption in politics! Democratic hacks, will do anything and say anything to hold on to power. Dem voter millennials and feminists seem to have swallowed their BS.

Race division, sexism, xenophobia, all seeds sown by the democrat machine. They lost that battle and now they are still clininging on to desparate conspiracy theories that just divide further and further.

It's cancerous.



Around the Network
UnderstatedCornHole said:
Puppyroach said:

What reactions were there when Hillary asked Saudi Arabia to do espionage in order to find dirt on Trump? Oh wait, that was Trump asking Russia to do it towards Hillary... And tabloids are able to find direct quotes of Trump saying he wants to molest women by grabbing their genitals yet Wikileaks can't find ANYTHING on the guy? Even you must find that at least a little bit suspicious?

So you are just here to spin any dirt you can think of on Trump that isn't related to the thread? What's worrying is that you aren't able to convey factually an event that had video and audio of the whole event.. Trump said he likes to grab women by the pussy because they let you. You have turned that into molesting and implying it is unwanted avances like the liberal MSM ran with.

There's an argument to be made that what's wrong with his statements on that is that he was referring to a married woman, but you seem to have missed that and gone for false liberal hyperbole.

It's irelevant if Wikileaks can find anything on the guy, if he's done so much wrong in the world and had the entire mainstream media and political establishment against him, then more would have come out than "grab 'em by the pussy" and his buisness dealings, oh and those discredited accusers.

Give me some facts.

I saw something saying something about someone paying those women to claim he rapped them or something.

DIdn't read the article. Was that true.

The fact that the story of trump rapping women or underage girls or something just sort of vanished in teh news, I figured it must have been fake. Whenever the media comes out with some HUGE story and in a few days its nver mentioned again usually means conflicting evidence came out and of course tehy enver correct themselves. I'm sure there are still many people who believe those initial stories as true. I mean heck, people still use that mantra "hands up don't shoot" when they found out that, that was a 100% lie. 



UnderstatedCornHole said:
deskpro2k3 said:

 

Trump was right then. It's rigged! Mystery solved.

Trump was right then AND now.

The MSM, New Media and establishment was rigged against him.

Widespread voter fraud from the democrats in ethnic areas as it's always been.

All that's obvious and was visible on election day results and every day priot to election.

There's a reason the older people get, the more they vote against the democrats. That reason was played out this election cycle.

Knowledge brings wisdom!

 

 

oh please. trump didn't know jack squat what he was saying. this is the same guy that said he wont accept the results if he lost, and if he did lose it would mean it was rigged against him. The real question is whether or not it was rigged for him, and that is still under investigation due to current CIA findings.



This gift just keeps on giving... quick, which one is the fake news? Is it CNN or CNN?

 



numberwang said:

This gift just keeps on giving... quick, which one is the fake news? Is it CNN or CNN?

You are not making any point by the way. You are comparing two headlines of two articles written by two different authors. Even if they written by the same author, without reading the articles we can't conclude shit. In the end, you are trying to smear the opposition in the laziest way possible, without making an actual effort. You would've managed Hillary's campaign just fine.

Do you even read the articles in question? You've been spamming the forums with these meaningless pictures without saying anything of value. What do you think our reaction is? "YEAH, YOU CAUGHT THEM MAN, GOOD JOB."

My god... What have gotten into your heads, Americans!



Around the Network

If Putin wanted to influence the election he could have just bribed Hillary the same way as every other dictatorship by giving money to the Clinton foundation - an actual hacking of the election.

We speak to Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Glenn Greenwald of The Intercept. His most recent piece is headlined "Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?"

https://www.democracynow.org/2016/8/29/greenwald_why_did_saudi_regime_other

 



deskpro2k3 said:
UnderstatedCornHole said:

Trump was right then AND now.

The MSM, New Media and establishment was rigged against him.

Widespread voter fraud from the democrats in ethnic areas as it's always been.

All that's obvious and was visible on election day results and every day priot to election.

There's a reason the older people get, the more they vote against the democrats. That reason was played out this election cycle.

Knowledge brings wisdom!

oh please. trump didn't know jack squat what he was saying. this is the same guy that said he wont accept the results if he lost, and if he did lose it would mean it was rigged against him. The real question is whether or not it was rigged for him, and that is still under investigation due to current CIA findings.

Put some substance across "please". You might believe what you are saying, but that doesn't meet the bar for discussion to just chuck words down without backing them up.

You have consistently misrepresented facts. In this post alone you have stated wrongly that Trump said he wouldn't accept the results of the election if he lost. He said he would have to look at it at the time, something any politican should say and do. That is the pragmatic way to do things.

But that isn't the point either, the point is you are making things up that Trump did not say or you could not possibly know.

That just makes you sound completely biased and to be honest is insulting to fellow members of VGChartz who want a good faith honest discussion. We might not all agree but we should all be bound by the same terms in a discussion.



Do you know what's the best way to prevent a foreign country from influencing the outcome of an election? Don't do shady shit behind the scenes and stay clean.



UnderstatedCornHole said:
deskpro2k3 said:

oh please. trump didn't know jack squat what he was saying. this is the same guy that said he wont accept the results if he lost, and if he did lose it would mean it was rigged against him. The real question is whether or not it was rigged for him, and that is still under investigation due to current CIA findings.

Put some substance across "please". You might believe what you are saying, but that doesn't meet the bar for discussion to just chuck words down without backing them up.

You have consistently misrepresented facts. In this post alone you have stated wrongly that Trump said he wouldn't accept the results of the election if he lost. He said he would have to look at it at the time, something any politican should say and do. That is the pragmatic way to do things.

But that isn't the point either, the point is you are making things up that Trump did not say or you could not possibly know.

That just makes you sound completely biased and to be honest is insulting to fellow members of VGChartz who want a good faith honest discussion. We might not all agree but we should all be bound by the same terms in a discussion.

 

bravo, I've got to give you a round of applause for sticking to your hunches, or feelings or whatever.

Anyways what does "I will keep you in suspense" mean? Mind you, It was a plain question which required a yes or no answer when he was asked if he'll accept the results. In other words, he won't say if he'll accept the result. What he was doing is called "beating around the bush" and I might add without evidence he said the general election has been rigged against him, and he twice refused to say that he would accept its result.

the irony in all this is that the results favored him instead, but now there is a possible reason why, and that is under investigation.



UnderstatedCornHole said:
Puppyroach said:

What reactions were there when Hillary asked Saudi Arabia to do espionage in order to find dirt on Trump? Oh wait, that was Trump asking Russia to do it towards Hillary... And tabloids are able to find direct quotes of Trump saying he wants to molest women by grabbing Taheri genitals yet Wikileaks can't find ANYTHING on the guy? Even you must find that at least a little bit suspicious?

So you are just here to spin any dirt you can think of on Trump that isn't related to the thread? What's worrying is that you aren't able to convey factually an event that had video and audio of the whole event.. Trump said he likes to grab women by the pussy because they let you. You have turned that into molesting and implying it is unwanted avances like the liberal MSM ran with.

There's an argument to be made that what's wrong with his statements on that is that he was referring to a married woman, but you seem to have missed that and gone for false liberal hyperbole.

It's irelevant if Wikileaks can find anything on the guy, if he's done so much wrong in the world and had the entire mainstream media and political establishment against him, then more would have come out than "grab 'em by the pussy" and his buisness dealings, oh and those discredited accusers.

Give me some facts.

So you mean there isn't video and audio of Trump openly saying he wish Russia could find those 30000emails? Here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gNa2B5zHfbQ

And being apologetic because he said that women "let him" grab them by the pussy... so suddenly it's the woman fault? Most molesters' think women "allow" them to do anything simply because it's their only way to rationalize their behaviour. It doesn't make the behaviour any more right.

And I would hate to have Hillary as president as well. She is corrupt in some of the worst ways possible. But from all the information we have, it's very clear he is still way worse.