UnderstatedCornHole said:
Put some substance across "please". You might believe what you are saying, but that doesn't meet the bar for discussion to just chuck words down without backing them up. You have consistently misrepresented facts. In this post alone you have stated wrongly that Trump said he wouldn't accept the results of the election if he lost. He said he would have to look at it at the time, something any politican should say and do. That is the pragmatic way to do things. But that isn't the point either, the point is you are making things up that Trump did not say or you could not possibly know. That just makes you sound completely biased and to be honest is insulting to fellow members of VGChartz who want a good faith honest discussion. We might not all agree but we should all be bound by the same terms in a discussion. |
bravo, I've got to give you a round of applause for sticking to your hunches, or feelings or whatever.
Anyways what does "I will keep you in suspense" mean? Mind you, It was a plain question which required a yes or no answer when he was asked if he'll accept the results. In other words, he won't say if he'll accept the result. What he was doing is called "beating around the bush" and I might add without evidence he said the general election has been rigged against him, and he twice refused to say that he would accept its result.
the irony in all this is that the results favored him instead, but now there is a possible reason why, and that is under investigation.
