Comparison:

GTA 5: 55 Mio (+ digital)

Call of Duty Black Ops 3: 25 Mio (+ digital)

Fifa 16: 14 Mio (+ digital)

Battlefront: 11 Mio (+ digital)

Battlefield 4: 14 Mio (+ digital)

Destiny: 13 Mio (+ digital)

obviously the better choice. Buy it and you can play your whole steam libraray on the go.

buy the switch and you can play some third party, some wii u ports and a handfull new nintendo games on the go. need to buy each seperatly.

Yomieeee said:

Interesting how you had to use multiplatform games to back up your argument...

Comparison:

GTA 5: 55 Mio (+ digital)

Call of Duty Black Ops 3: 25 Mio (+ digital)

Fifa 16: 14 Mio (+ digital)

Battlefront: 11 Mio (+ digital)

Battlefield 4: 14 Mio (+ digital)

Destiny: 13 Mio (+ digital)

Those games are alot more appealing for the mature audience. And the switch seems to be aimed at a mature audience (not saying nintendo games are for kids, but those cartoony games do probl appeal more to them and the cheap 3ds/2ds is more affordable for them as well).

Also: 15 years ago, games like zelda were almost without competition. Now a days we have third party games like Witcher 3, FF15, Kingdom Hearts 3. Im not saying those games are the same, but in terms of open world, gameplay/fighting, exploration those games are similr if not even better then new zelda games. BOTW looks very promising, but nintendo is definitly not the leader in those games anymore (and they were that back in the days).

Are you serious or joking?

People obviously get a console like ps4/xbox one for their multiplats (sales proove this). 

Those game still sell more gaming systems then Nintendos IPs. And those games are all available on the smachZ

The issue is, I really love Nintendo's games. TBH I'd take a "handfull" of them over 90% of the games in my Steam library. Say what you will about Nintendo, but they do know how to make quality products. Plus I missed out on the Wii U, so I'm gonna have a ton of titles to play on the Switch from day one, if all the port rumors are for real.

No, I think you don't understand what I'm saying. I'm saying that the fact that you had to compare total sales of a game across ALL platforms it released on is a little silly. Why not list what battlefield sold on PS4 and XB1 separatley?

Because it doesnt make much sense? There were X people in total that wanted to play battlefield and got it. Like their are X people in total that wanted to play Pokemon and got it. The system doesnt matter.

The number of BF sales on ps4 wouldnt match the general interest in the franchise. And that what we are talking about.

You arnt dividing the sales of 3ds games between 2ds, 3ds, 3ds xl, new 3ds and new 3dsxl either right? ;)

Because it doesnt make much sense? There were X people in total that wanted to play battlefield and got it. Like their are X people in total that wanted to play Pokemon and got it. The system doesnt matter.

The number of BF sales on ps4 wouldnt match the general interest in the franchise. And that what we are talking about.

You arnt dividing the sales of 3ds games between 2ds, 3ds, 3ds xl, new 3ds and new 3dsxl either right? ;)

Ok fine, even if you add the platforms together it still doesn't discredit Nintendo games not selling. Look at the attach rates for Nintendo games and tell me that they don't sell....