By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - NVIDIA CEO about Switch: “it was such a ground-breaking design”

Nvidia are making Nintendo look bad, with all this bs PR. I hope switch doesn't flop, gaming industry needs nintendo to keep MS and Sony in check. but it kind of feels familiar to Wii U launch and i m pretty sure nintendo will be able to sell NS at cheap coz basically they took plans for scrapped Nvidia shield 2 and "switched" a bit eliminating major R&D cost. Wont be suprised if switch fails, they will go exclusive to apple devices.



Around the Network
taus90 said:
Nvidia are making Nintendo look bad, with all this bs PR. I hope switch doesn't flop, gaming industry needs nintendo to keep MS and Sony in check. but it kind of feels familiar to Wii U launch and i m pretty sure nintendo will be able to sell NS at cheap coz basically they took plans for scrapped Nvidia shield 2 and "switched" a bit eliminating major R&D cost. Wont be suprised if switch fails, they will go exclusive to apple devices.

Lol, why!?

Actually everything about Switch, with first trailer and full reveal 2.5m before reveal actually looks totally opposite to Wii U.



onionberry said:
vivster said:

So you didn't look it up? Great. Now try again and stop talking about streaming. Thanks.

A Tegra Tablet with a controller that plugs into your TV. Sound familiar? Nintendo added a new Name and remodeled the controller, then called it a day.

Not saying they stole the idea, just that it's very very far from the definition of groundbreaking.

even when I I agree with you, you  are mean, I said that I KNOW and the SWITCH IS BASICALLY THE SEQUEL OF THE TABLET FROM NVIDIA, BUT THAT TABLET IS SHIT BECAUSE THE GAMES ARE not WOTH IT AND IF YOU WANT TO PLAY GOOD GAME ON THE TABLET YOU HAVE TO USE THEIR STREAMING SERVICE. caps lock because you deserve it.

User was warned for this post

-Super_Boom

Holy poop chute! it's the first time I've seen you get angryish / upset on here. I think this proves it, Nintendo makes you angry... it makes you... SWITCH *b'dumtish*

 

:p



taus90 said:
Nvidia are making Nintendo look bad, with all this bs PR.

Yep, basically xD



Something that has bothered me since NVidia released its press release on the Switch's was they used the word "scalable" to describe the chip. When chip makers use this terminology they are referring to how much they can modify the chip architecture to get more power out of it.

So it makes me think this. Looking back at how Nintendo has handled it handhelds in the past they like releasing updated, more powerful versions of the handheld every several years, and with this practice now being used at least in this generation for the PS4 and slim Xbox One. Nintendo may be planning to fuse the tradition console generation and what is used by Smart Phones and pads. And release an updated version of its Switch every few years with a more powerful SOC, making the new Switch backwards compatible with the other versions.

And with NVidia's proprietary APIs it makes easier to replace the chips without affecting bc. Plus with Nintendo's addition of interchangeable controllers this may be the console that Nintendo plans on sticking with for awhile.



Around the Network
onionberry said:
JEMC said:

You're the one that used those figures and then compared them with the Switch .

And sure, Nvidia is more efficient than AMD, but we're talking about a device that will consume 15, maybe up to 20W in a best case scenario while the competing machines (PS4 Slim & XboxOne S) use more than 3x that power and are build in the same manufacturing process. Not even Nvidia is that efficient.

And let's not forget that, while Maxwell or Pascal can do certain tasks better than AMD's Tahiti, the latest can also do certain tasks better than what Nvidia has.

all i'm trying to say is, we don't have the specs, as a matter of fact we don't have the actual architecture, could be pascal could be volta and we don't know the optimization. So the "switch is weak and underpowered" statement is not fair just yet, weaker than the ps4 or xbox, maybe, but how weak? also, we are talking about a tablet here (form factor and ignoring the dock) and that's other thing, the dock could have a high performance mode or something like that.

Please tell me that you just used Volta as an example, because the chances of Nintendo using Volta architecture on the Switch is not even zero but negative. Maxwell at worst or Pascal at best, those are the two chances, not anyone else.

On the calling the Switch weak and underpowered, something that I haven't done, I agree that isn't fair, but given that the device also replaces the WiiU and is designed in part to work as a home console, comparing it to the current competition in the home console space is not unfair, and it's even needed when it comes to discussing third party support.

Lastly, about the dock providing a high performance boost, that idea is only backed by the internet speculation (that believes that having a dock that doesn't provide extra performance is silly) against what Nintendo said after the teaser reveal: "The main function of the Nintendo Switch Dock is to provide an output to the TV, as well as charging and providing power to the system." (via IGN). Given that I don't remember any tweet or anything from Rogers or any other insider saying otherwise (note that I don't say that they don't exist, only that I don't remember them), I'll trust Nintendo more than "the internet".

Miyamotoo said:
JEMC said:

You're the one that used those figures and then compared them with the Switch .

And sure, Nvidia is more efficient than AMD, but we're talking about a device that will consume 15, maybe up to 20W in a best case scenario while the competing machines (PS4 Slim & XboxOne S) use more than 3x that power and are build in the same manufacturing process. Not even Nvidia is that efficient.

And let's not forget that, while Maxwell or Pascal can do certain tasks better than AMD's Tahiti, the latest can also do certain tasks better than what Nvidia has.

Just have on mind that PS4Slim/XB1s have AMD tech from 2012, while Switch has Nvidia tech most likely from 2016, so comparing consumptions of different tech from different period doesn't make too much sense. Also Switch can easily consume 20W or more in docked mode. So yes, we can definatly say that Switch will have advantage in terms of efficiency and power consumption compared to real power of hardware.

Miyamotoo, we've already discussed the power consumptionthing in another thread, so I'm not going there again. I know it's a lost battle and I have better ways to lose my time.

But what you seem to forget is that the Switch also has to run the game in portable mode, and in that mode it won't be able to use those 20W (far from it), but it will also have to power the screen, leaving even less than half those 20W for games. If you take into consideration that games must run in both modes and that no, lowering the resolution won't magically solve the problem, you'll be better if you start to lower your expectations before you get disappointed.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

JEMC said:
onionberry said:

all i'm trying to say is, we don't have the specs, as a matter of fact we don't have the actual architecture, could be pascal could be volta and we don't know the optimization. So the "switch is weak and underpowered" statement is not fair just yet, weaker than the ps4 or xbox, maybe, but how weak? also, we are talking about a tablet here (form factor and ignoring the dock) and that's other thing, the dock could have a high performance mode or something like that.

Please tell me that you just used Volta as an example, because the chances of Nintendo using Volta architecture on the Switch is not even zero but negative. Maxwell at worst or Pascal at best, those are the two chances, not anyone else.

Nvidia CEO just said that Switch is groundbreaking. Since nothing apparent on the outside is groundbreaking he must be talking about the GPU. Volta confirmed!

http://www.pcworld.com/article/3125456/hardware/nvidia-teases-volta-gpu-in-next-gen-xavier-self-driving-car-computer.html



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

because they want to build something that’s portable and transformable.

Change of form... Become something else... Stop to be only a handheld device...



JEMC said:
Miyamotoo said:

Just have on mind that PS4Slim/XB1s have AMD tech from 2012, while Switch has Nvidia tech most likely from 2016, so comparing consumptions of different tech from different period doesn't make too much sense. Also Switch can easily consume 20W or more in docked mode. So yes, we can definatly say that Switch will have advantage in terms of efficiency and power consumption compared to real power of hardware.

Miyamotoo, we've already discussed the power consumptionthing in another thread, so I'm not going there again. I know it's a lost battle and I have better ways to lose my time.

But what you seem to forget is that the Switch also has to run the game in portable mode, and in that mode it won't be able to use those 20W (far from it), but it will also have to power the screen, leaving even less than half those 20W for games. If you take into consideration that games must run in both modes and that no, lowering the resolution won't magically solve the problem, you'll be better if you start to lower your expectations before you get disappointed.

Maybe we talk about it before, but fact is that you can't really compare power consumption of AMD tech from 2012 and Nvidia tech most likely form 2016.

Of Course, it's expected that games will be run in much lower clocks in handheld mode while in docked mode will be running at full or higher clocks. And just 720p in portable mode, compared to 1080p in docked mode make big difference in power.



vivster said:
JEMC said:

Please tell me that you just used Volta as an example, because the chances of Nintendo using Volta architecture on the Switch is not even zero but negative. Maxwell at worst or Pascal at best, those are the two chances, not anyone else.

Nvidia CEO just said that Switch is groundbreaking. Since nothing apparent on the outside is groundbreaking he must be talking about the GPU. Volta confirmed!

http://www.pcworld.com/article/3125456/hardware/nvidia-teases-volta-gpu-in-next-gen-xavier-self-driving-car-computer.html

Please stop before someone believes it!



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.