Then why are MSony making new versions already? Why is the total console sales lower Gen over Gen?

Logically, you are right. But that is not the point. Each console having the same basic 3rd party offerings is good for the 3rd party and the consumers. Exclusives and actual hardware differences is where the choice comes, Capcom shouldn't care which console the latest Resident Evil game is purchased from as that should yeild the same level of profit as the other consoles. 

Those games should be left as-is, unless the console manufacturer is paying for something of value, to ensure consumer expectations are met. Doing something unique is better served with new IP.

Bland and uninspired is exactly what core gamers want. They don't care about how unique it is. They want their Maddens, CoDs, and FIFAs on a regular controller. They also don't want compromises in order to make the game work on the system, and that is what we're most likely to see. 3rd party will be making all sorts of sacrifices in order to make a game fly on Switch. Eventually they will have to pretty much break their games to do it, and it will be too much effort.

I'm thinking that by the end of next year we'll hear next to nothing from 3rd party devs when all their big AAA franchises can't work on Switch.

Problem with this line of thinking is with the budgets of games today, are companies really going to put huge efforts into Switch games?

PS4/XB1 will be at around 80 million combined by year end, and 85 million-ish by the time the Switch even sells 1 unit.

Also Capcom's support for the 3DS outside of Monster Hunter games is actually rather mediocre for several years now. What happened to any future Resident Evil or Street Fighter games? Megaman in Smash maybe we could have a Megaman ga -- oh ok, no.

Nintendo fans should be leery of thinking these companies are magically going to treat the Switch like a special snowflake and put huge resources into a system that has a fraction of the userbase as their PS4/XB1/PC projects do.

It also could lead to an unfair 2 way street where PS4/XB1 get ports of Switch games, since that will be easy to do, but Switch misses a lot of PS4/XB1 because that will be harder to accomodate. Resident Evil Revelations ended up on PS3/360 ... but Resident Evil Revelations 2 .... no 3DS or Wii U. 

Problem with this line of thinking is with the budgets of games today, are companies really going to put huge efforts into Switch games?

PS4/XB1 will be at around 80 million combined by year end, and 85 million-ish by the time the Switch even sells 1 unit.

Also Capcom's support for the 3DS outside of Monster Hunter games is actually rather mediocre for several years now. What happened to any future Resident Evil or Street Fighter games? Megaman in Smash maybe we could have a Megaman ga -- oh ok, no.

Nintendo fans should be leery of thinking these companies are magically going to treat the Switch like a special snowflake and put huge resources into a system that has a fraction of the userbase as their PS4/XB1/PC projects do.

It also could lead to an unfair 2 way street where PS4/XB1 get ports of Switch games, since that will be easy to do, but Switch misses a lot of PS4/XB1 because that will be harder to accomodate. Resident Evil Revelations ended up on PS3/360 ... but Resident Evil Revelations 2 .... no 3DS or Wii U. 

I am unfortunately thinking this as well. The only thing we can hope for is it to be adopted like the Wii forcing developers to take notice.

But the thing is that they aren't talking about porting, he's saying that they won't make ports but "something different".

Look, Capcom isn't in very good position right now when it comes to money (or games, to be honest. They only hae 3 successful franchises and with SF V they've killed one of them for awhile). If they could port their existing games to the Switch for less than making that "something different", you can bet your ass that that's exactly what they would do.