I'm not sure off the budget of pokemon tbh but it can't be say as much as The Witcher 3 for example which was 10 million I think or say GTA5 that was 50 million. But how much would a brand new HD 3D open world pokemon or MH game gonna cost. 

Why would that matter? People want those games. You see the reaction to NES Mini? Those games look like "shit" and people are eager to play them. Why spend tens of millions of dollars building some highly detailed open world when consumers have proven they're just fine with games that look like 3DS titles. Frankly it's a waste of time and resources. 

I can't see that being a problem.
The adaptation to HD will hurt some companies, but maybe not that many. Most companies have already years of HD development experience. The hurdle doesn't need to exist as before.

You will see a mix of game of all sort of budgets. There's nothing strange about that and i can't see why that will cause droughts.
Nintendo, by avoiding development for 2 separate systems, can use the team that develops 2 Marios, to make one and something else (the same for other Nintendo studios).
That being, Switch can have more games per year and even end his life with enough support - unlike other consoles like Wii U, for exemple.

You sure?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbxQXwwURPY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07Z2Nk-4ltE

Why not? They've always made home console Monster Hunter games in the past. Why would Switch be the exception?

Have you any idea how much a MH game cost to make?

I understand your fear. Some developers might migrate to mobile console due to increased development cost. But it really depends on how well NS sale will be. If the userbase is high, games will come to NS

They have it set to "off"? Hahahaha.

I didn't really fully grasp your OP, but you're basically still worried about droughts because they will be making more intricate, more advanced games? Hard to say, I guess. The Switch is primarily a home console so my guess games will definitely be more high-end and we can expect longer development. The games should be consistent though, like it would be off putting if some games were meant/budgeted or at the quality of a handheld, then others that are more along the lines of full blown, AAAs.

I'm still confused.

I think I get his point

It's not going to be easy for devs that have been working with n64-psone era graphics on small screens to something bigger, sort of HD that has to look good on a big TV. Wasn't easy for Nintendo main studios to jump from Wii to Wii U without some developement troubles and I don't expect it to be easy for devs that have been working on 3DS to support something that Nintendo says it's a homeconsole.

Obviously, support will be way better than Wii U and hopefully on 3DS level, but people get way too excited and are too quick to assume NS software will be Wii U+3ds