JRPGfan said:
A new 3DS successor would f*** over the Nintendo Switch. Its main selling point is its also portable. You make a new 3DS you f*** that up. And worse, you f*** up the new 3DS too, because it ll be competeing against the Switch. Then guess what also happends.... unified games library? maybe goes out the window. Its alot better if nintendo doesnt do that.
This isnt like the WiiU + 3DS that serviced to differnt market needs.
This is one of the things I fear might ruin the success the Switch could be.
|
JRPGfan said:
tak13 said:
WOw people are not wanting a separate 3ds successor! Edit: Things changed, it's almost a tie.
I wonder if switch is expensive for a handheld, will they change their mind? :)
|
If that happends Nintendo is the one to blame.
They need to sell the tablet part (without dock + controller) for 199$.
So its possible to own a Nintendo Switch for 199$ (although one that doesnt play on tv).
That is the right way of things.
I think a 3DS successor wrecks nintendos Switch.
It would be a waste of Research & developement to have 2 devices so simular, when you already have one suited for the same needs.
It could potentially ruin the unified games library concept that nintendo needs to get by without 3rd party.
|
JRPGfan said:
tak13 said:
WOw people are not wanting a separate 3ds successor! I wonder if switch is expensive for a handheld, will they change their mind? :)
|
If that happends Nintendo is the one to blame.
They need to sell the tablet part (without dock + controller) for 199$.
So its possible to own a Nintendo Switch for 199$ (although one that doesnt play on tv).
That is the right way of things.
I think a 3DS successor wrecks nintendos Switch.
It would be a waste of Research & developement to have 2 devices so simular, when you already have one suited for the same needs.
It could potentially ruin the unified games library concept that nintendo needs to get by without 3rd party.
|
What you say is valid, i have mentioned most of these in the op, but what if advantages are more than disadvantages? Have you weight them on your mind?
I mean, Nintendo may sell 40m switches just because you can play outside or wherever what you were playing on your tv, sitting on the sofa... ( 40m from the 14m+ selling predecessor, more than gc and close to SNES is a huge improvement ) . Forget the wii heights, they're needelss for a Nintendo home console commercial success and it's very difficult to be repeated for known reasons!
The actual selling point is that you can transfer '' home gaming outside with that system '' ! Who will buy switch as handheld ? It's not very portable and might be expensive for a handheld! Nintendo says it's a home gaming system, first and foremost.
So, make the 3ds successor to cater to the 3ds audience... And sell another 70m hardware! Total of 110m, switch alone may not sell half of that, if its exprensive for a handheld console! Unless, the concept is so attactive that lures people never interested in Nintendo or get back the wii market!
I insist, people will buy it as home console that can be a handheld console not the opposite. it will attract more people than the wii u just owing to that comodity! Continuing playing while nature calls you... ;)
However, there was always a vast amount of Nintendo handheld console gamers that weren't buying their home brothers of their handheld consoles, will they do it for the hybrid?
Don't you find how risky it is for their handheld buisness?
As for the shared library, you're definately right, howbeit there is solution! Keep the shared library, people will choose among the home console x higher end handheld console and the lower end handheld console! With switch you catch the audience who will buy switch as a home console that lets you continue what your were playing on tv sitting on your sofa, wherever your want and with an XDS the price/portability sensitive audience!
A 3ds sepearate successor could be for switch what 2ds is for 3ds. ;)