Volterra_90 said:
Honestly, Nintendo could have made the most powerful console in the market, with all the third party support possible and great exclusive games, and it wouldn't attract core gamers (I mean, MS/Sony/PC gamers) just because of stubborness and brand loyalty. They should really focus on keeping their userbase and attract casual gamers again. Make it cheap, accessible and marketable. Provide a good games lineup. And don't try to fight tech wise, it's just pointless. That's just my opinion, though. |
Yes, because Nintendo gamers aren't stubborn right? You decided to classify Nintendo games as the best there will always be as gospel and that people wouldn't buy a Switch stronger than PS5/XboxNext with all third parties because of stubbornes right?
Some people may preffer Halo or Gran Turismo, yes it seems impossible, but it can be. And you talk about people that are attached to franchises they play for 10 years and ignore some that play over 30 years.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."