Ka-pi96 said:
Acevil said:
Actual development is done by GameFreak, but the company is basically management firm for Pokemon. They sort of decide the decision making of where it will go (Not like they actually would go anywhere else, since Nintendo owns a huge part of them and the actual IP itself.)
|
33% isn`t really a huge part, and is actually the same % that GameFreak owns of them. If GameFreak wanted to make say a home console Pokemon game rather than a handheld one I don`t expect the Pokemon Company would have all that much say in it.
Regardless, the term `make` games for it would still be incorrect since they aren`t actually making them either way.
|
Nintendo members founded 'Creatures' company, they own a portion of the Pokemon Company as well as the rights to the IP, they own a portion of Game Freak on their own and then Game Freak has a stake in the Pok. Co. I believe. HAL Labratories which also has a stake in the Pokemon IP is a fully controlled second party developer of Nintendo (Kirby series)
make no mistake, Nintendo is in control of all of the companies involved with Pokemon, whether distributing/marketing OR creating the g ames. The reality is that if a larger corporation has a big enough percentage of ownership over you you're going to have to roll their way, not to mention the fact that Nintendo was largely involved with the creation of all of these parts except HAL Labratories
I also believe I've heard that due to how some of the business laws are structured in Japan that its actually favorable to have certain aspects of your business broken off rather than directly internal (i.e. Nintendo not ever bothering to absorb some of these fractions directly and fully)
end the end the big N controls the IP and that makes them boss.
as for the question on hand- I think this is an extreme exaggeration, the Pokemon Company has in fact been involved with console developed Pokemon games before.... this statement doesn't mean anything on its own