By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - Jurassic World 2 Is Apparently Going To Have An Absolutely Insane Budget

VitroBahllee on 19 September 2016
KLXVER said:

It was just silly imo. The guy controlling the raptors, the whole making of a new breed of dinosaur and it was basically the same plot as in the first Jurassic Park.

The first one is great because it conveys very well the wonder of these creatures and how scary they can be.

This is something I heard a lot of, especially from people who wet their pants at Star Wars: The Force Awakens, which was like 'Star Wars' Greatest Hits.'

You talk about all the new elements, and then say it was basically the same plot as the first movie.

Except with 10,000 park guests rather than 5 consultants, the dinosaurs escaping were the same plot.

Raptors not escaping, but being set free to perform a mission, but otherwise the fact that raptors were in it is the 'same plot.'

We get 9 super hero movies a year, and after a 14 year break, we are getting a second dinosaur movie three years after the first was a hit. The presence of dinosaurs does not make it 'the same plot.' How about our third Star Wars movie about stopping a giant device that blows up planets? How about it? Pants wettingly excited.

First dinosaur movie in almost a decade and a half, with a fully operational park, raptors being trained by a zoologist, a hybrid dinosaur to expand profits, and the biggest sea-dwelling prehistoric reptile currently known, a subplot about brothers bonding (the two kids in the first movie were just generic kids), an aunt realizing that family is as important as work, the lead geneticist having ulterior, military motives, a plan to weaponize the dinosaurs, and a deepening of the idea of 'meddling with extinct organisms can bacakfire in unexpected ways?' It's apparently the 'same plot.'



Around the Network
StarOcean on 19 September 2016

Please be better than the first Jurassic World...



Player2 on 19 September 2016
Acevil said:

"The original Jurassic World had a perfectly reasonable, for a summer blockbuster, budget of $150 million. However, as the movie brought in more than $1.6 billion, the return on investment was still ridiculously high. It would seem that Universal is hoping that an increase in the budget will have an equivalent, or better, impact on the box office. The figure comes from a perfectly legit source too. The movie's director JA Bayona, gave a recent interview to Spanish-language magazine El Pais Seminal which has been translated by Scified. While it's possible something was lost in translation, even in another language, numbers are usually pretty straightforward."

http://www.cinemablend.com/news/1557579/jurassic-world-2-is-apparently-going-to-have-an-absolutely-insane-budget

This biggest RED FLAG EVER! Do they really not know what they are setting themselves in for?

You bet.

Seminal: Relative to semen from male animals.

Semanal: Weekly.

And that's the spanish lesson of the day.



Goodnightmoon on 19 September 2016
KLXVER said:
VitroBahllee said:
Do people really think JW is a bad movie? I am a huge JP fan and have re-read the book more than any other book, and I loved JW. So did audiences. I'm not sure why people are so against it. If they include tons of awesome dinosaur action, people will not be 'burnt out' on it. Dinosaurs are the most fascinating and awe-inspiring animals ever to exist. If you think 'a' movie with them in it more often than every 14 years is 'too much,' you haven't thought about it enough.

It was just silly imo. The guy controlling the raptors, the whole making of a new breed of dinosaur and it was basically the same plot as in the first Jurassic Park.

The first one is great because it conveys very well the wonder of these creatures and how scary they can be.

Agree, and also first one was really well directed, it knew how to create tension and it was really scary at times, is plenty of great scenes and some memorable characters too, JW has nothing of what made the first one great other than dinasours, the plot is offensively bad at times, the characters are meh, it has no atmosphere, no tension, no logic. It's so weak.

hershel_layton said:
KLXVER said:
The previous one wasn't very good. Hope this will be better.

 

Goodnightmoon said:

Let's hope is also not insanely bad again.

 

At least it won't be as bad as the generic superhero movies we get every year.

At least is not another super hero movie, yes, but JW was under the average quality of those anyways.

Let's hope the 2nd changes that.



KLXVER on 19 September 2016
VitroBahllee said:
KLXVER said:

It was just silly imo. The guy controlling the raptors, the whole making of a new breed of dinosaur and it was basically the same plot as in the first Jurassic Park.

The first one is great because it conveys very well the wonder of these creatures and how scary they can be.

This is something I heard a lot of, especially from people who wet their pants at Star Wars: The Force Awakens, which was like 'Star Wars' Greatest Hits.'

You talk about all the new elements, and then say it was basically the same plot as the first movie.

Except with 10,000 park guests rather than 5 consultants, the dinosaurs escaping were the same plot.

Raptors not escaping, but being set free to perform a mission, but otherwise the fact that raptors were in it is the 'same plot.'

We get 9 super hero movies a year, and after a 14 year break, we are getting a second dinosaur movie three years after the first was a hit. The presence of dinosaurs does not make it 'the same plot.' How about our third Star Wars movie about stopping a giant device that blows up planets? How about it? Pants wettingly excited.

First dinosaur movie in almost a decade and a half, with a fully operational park, raptors being trained by a zoologist, a hybrid dinosaur to expand profits, and the biggest sea-dwelling prehistoric reptile currently known, a subplot about brothers bonding (the two kids in the first movie were just generic kids), an aunt realizing that family is as important as work, the lead geneticist having ulterior, military motives, a plan to weaponize the dinosaurs, and a deepening of the idea of 'meddling with extinct organisms can bacakfire in unexpected ways?' It's apparently the 'same plot.'

Well I havent seen the new Star Wars, so I cant comment on that.

Sure it had some different sub plots, but it was still silly. It feels like the first movie didnt happen. The people responsible for this park are idiots. Letting children drive around freely in a ball thing among huge dinosaurs? Creating a new breed from the DNA of some of the most dangerous dinosaurs to ever live? The flying ones would just be insane to ever have in a park where thousands of people visit. There were just so much stupidity in the so called scientists, it was hard to watch.

Just because we havent gotten a dinosaur movie in a long time, doesnt give it a free pass.



Around the Network
Louie_86 on 19 September 2016

Jurassic World was just meh. Im surprised it did so well in box office. Lets hope the next one is actually decent.



Fei-Hung on 19 September 2016

I want the sequel to be about how the sea thingy has escaped and laid many eggs. Shoot the next one on a small island that is surrounded by smaller islands where the sea creatures end up turning up along with pterodactyls and giant mosquitos carrying a virus .

It will be like jaws, attack of the killer bees, outbreak and The Birds all in one.

They won't be able to send planes or ships, the entire island will need to be quarantined, humans will need to move underground whilst nature reclaims everything and other dinosaurs start making their way over.

The first movie will be fleeing to safety underground after the outbreak.

The second movie would be the world super powers deciding if to nuke the island or send in a rescue team. The rescue team gets sent who have control over state of the art gunships and giant mechs to set up base on the island.

The final part would be the rescue team and the locals military going balls out and reclaiming the island in a fiery blaze of glory. From the international team of rescue mechs and pilots, only the Americans will survive although using inferior dated tech compared to the Germans, Chinese and Japanese through share will power and patriotism.



Naum on 19 September 2016

JW was an OK movie.. so was most of the CGI except for the water with it's "fish" dinos... those where freakishly bad.



If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing   (mostly)

And shepherds we shall be,

For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints

KLXVER on 19 September 2016
Fei-Hung said:
I want the sequel to be about how the sea thingy has escaped and laid many eggs. Shoot the next one on a small island that is surrounded by smaller islands where the sea creatures end up turning up along with pterodactyls and giant mosquitos carrying a virus .

It will be like jaws, attack of the killer bees, outbreak and The Birds all in one.

They won't be able to send planes or ships, the entire island will need to be quarantined, humans will need to move underground whilst nature reclaims everything and other dinosaurs start making their way over.

The first movie will be fleeing to safety underground after the outbreak.

The second movie would be the world super powers deciding if to nuke the island or send in a rescue team. The rescue team gets sent who have control over state of the art gunships and giant mechs to set up base on the island.

The final part would be the rescue team and the locals military going balls out and reclaiming the island in a fiery blaze of glory. From the international team of rescue mechs and pilots, only the Americans will survive although using inferior dated tech compared to the Germans, Chinese and Japanese through share will power and patriotism.

You could make it big in Hollywood these days.



SkepticallyMinded on 19 September 2016

I hope no one sees it. This is the problem with bad movies being great financial investments. The studio is convinced to produce a sequel in an effort to make even more money. Will not be a patron of this process.