By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Forget 4K Blu-ray, as a die-hard PC gamer I'm hugely impressed by the PS4 Pro

Trunkin said:
This reads like a paid promotion...

Article and the profile pic really do drive that point home



https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png

Around the Network
Trunkin said:
This reads like a paid promotion...

My thoughts exactly xD



For $399 it is nothing short of amazing, only bad thing is exclusion of a 4k bluray drive.

Also never understand the cheap pc vs console argument. All the people I know in pc gaming built pc's above $800, often twice that with the latest cpus and gpus and are on yearly upgrade cycles. PC gamers want a notable difference against the consoles and this whole ""console price" is going against that.

Who is actually buying a $299-399 pc with the intent of playing at console settings, not only is your pc hopelessly outdated but you're also missing out on all the AAA exclusives like Uncharted, Horizon, God of War and Spiderman. This wass the reasoning 2-3 years ago and still valid today, only difference is PS4 Pro is now providing the equivalent of even pricier pcs, at the same cost. Looking at Tomb Raider and Deus Ex, it's not exactly 1:1 but who cares when it costs $1000 less.



Ruler said:

Bottom line: getting this sort of performance on a compact living room PC for £349 is impossible right now. While I am disappointed Sony hasn’t bothered to include an SSD instead of a clunky old mechanical hard disk, it’s an impressive piece of kit.

Noticed the Biased by omitting any and all advantages the PC has?
What about the free online? Cheaper games? Cheaper accessories? Cheaper DLC?
There are more to a platforms costs than just the outright hardware. (And I would argue their choice of hardware wasn't the most cost-effective either.)


Ruler said:

The addition of Polaris-based hardware to the PS4 Pro has given the console mid-range gaming PC levels of performance in terms of raw, brute-force power. In fact, the chip inside is exactly the same as the one in the RX 480 (albeit at a slightly slower clock speed), which is a great sign.


Pretty sure we haven't had a deep architectural analysis with die-shots etc' to know exactly the kind of GPU that is in the PS4 Pro and whether or not it is actually Polaris based or a slightly modified GCN 1.1 type block like what was in the regular PS4.

Cerny even states that the chip itself "adopted many new features from the AMD Polaris architecture." which lends credence to the idea that it is not actually  a pure GCN 4.0 design like what is found in Polaris.

 

Ruler said:

What have they done? For 4K upscaling, the prevailing theory is that the PS4 Pro renders double the number of pixels to Full HD (around 2,688 x 1,512 according to Digital Foundry) and then uses advanced upscaling technology to delicately massage it up to 4K resolution.

This is done by using clever anti-aliasing algorithms that take an intelligent look at a set of pixels and decide how to upscale them. The result? Sharper-looking transitions between objects, more detailed images and none of that horrible, blurry softness you get with the most basic upscaling tech.

This means the GPU only has to render double the number of pixels to Full HD instead of six times for 4K. That makes a huge difference to performance.

It’s never going to be as good as true 4K, but the promise is that many games will be able to run at the crucial 60fps at this upscaled resolution, which is unheard of for a GPU of this calibre. If developers are actually able to make this happen, this is a huge deal.

 

It's still not native 4k whatever way you look at it. Frame Reconstruction, Upscaling? They help, but they aren't true 4k and the quality will be a compromised.

The sweet spot for a Graphics chip at this level is going to be 2560x1440 for 60fps.

 

Ruler said:

Don’t have a 4K TV? Don’t fret: the PS4 Pro could still be for you. The suggestion is that PS4 Pro owners will be able to play games at higher graphical settings if their console is hooked up to a Full HD TV. If this turns out to be a seamless experience, this could be a very tempting upgrade path for current PS4 owners who don’t yet have the cash to buy a 4K TV.

 

If 4k is *truly* important to you, then PC is your only choice, plain and simple.

If 4k Blu-Ray is important to you, then the Xbox One S is a viable contender.
Either way, I would wait for Scorpio to see how the cards fall so to speak, if it's Vega based and using HBM it might just be the 4k console we have been looking for.


pray4mojo said:

If I were a die hard PC gamer, I would snicker at both machines because both are underpowered and behind my platform of choice.

On an unrelated matter, does anyone else cringe when you read "game(s) console" or "video game(s) industry"? It's one of the most illogical things anyone could ever utter. It just makes zero grammatical sense.

Funny you say that, before Polaris launched I was excited at the prospect of having Four of them... Then when it did launch I was like...


And now console gamers think it's the second coming.

Kowan said:

The Last of Us, Smite(native 4k 60fps) and elders scrolls online are all confirmed native 4k on the Ps4pro. So more games with similar visuals should be expected run at native 4k as well if the developer chooses to.

http://gematsu.com/2016/09/elder-scrolls-online-ps4-pro-support-announced

https://www.reddit.com/r/PS4/comments/51q0o2/smite_is_running_at_native_4k_60fps_on_a_ps4_pro/

http://www.playstationlifestyle.net/2016/09/09/the-last-of-us-ps4-pro-wil-run-at-native-4k/

That was entirely expected though, those games aren't exactly cutting edge/demanding, you can expect a similar experience on PC with similar GPU grunt.


Trunkin said:
This reads like a paid promotion...

This.




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite

Fact is that Playstation narrowed the gap to PC gaming and the difference in the coming year will be marginal.



Around the Network
Captain_Yuri said:
"Getting this sort of performance on a compact living room PC for £349 is impossible right now."

110% agreed. The price point for the Pro is amazing. I was assuming it will be at least $450 for $400 is just craycray.

Well said.  I'm really excited for what they can pull off with the ps5. I didn't think what they've pulled off was possible in 2016 so I'm excited for 2020.



Trunkin said:
This reads like a paid promotion...

Sounds like he isn't even a "die hard" PC gamer. Most I've seen and read that are dedicated PC gamers never talk about a console the way he does, he's more gushing for it and all "welp PC gaming got kicked in the weeds" kind of talk. We are in this day and age where I can own a laptop from 10 years ago and still make that easy claim that I'm a die hard PC gamer without actually doing any saif PC gaming. It's like how easy it is to say tosomeone on the street that I donate my free time to the Red Cross without actually having to and people would have to take my word for it. 

Also he's comparing a PC for less of the price of the Pro and not comparing a build that is better to play at native 4k. End of the day a really dirt cheap PC (talking in the £2-300 range) setup won't be able to compete agains the PF ratio of the pro, but that doesn't mean to say we can't show up the differences between a high end setup vs the pro (which seems to get shoved out the door because of the price argument which is silly at that point toa rgue).

 

Also just like to point out that OP left the alst piece of the article out (of course for convenience sake): 

Custom PC builders need not fear: there are still enormous advantages to building your own PC, not least the ability to upgrade the graphics card every two or three years when gaming technology advances. That, and the fact actually buying PC games is a lot cheaper in the long run. The so-called 'PC Master Race' probably isn’t worried, but everybody else looking for higher quality graphics on consoles should be delighted.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

So pretty much like all Sony/Microsoft consoles when they launched? It's always been like that.



Azzanation said:
Well considering the PS4 Pro doesn't render 4k native and does not have a UHD Player built in. No it doesn't. Its just another underpowered console trying to be like a PC.
Consoles are trying to become more and more like a PC that now it defeats the purpose of even owning a console. My Laptop provides more power than the Pro and I can also use it for work.

provide specs for your Laptop before saying something like that.

Most PC gamers in gaming forums like these or else were cant run games at 4K so whats your point here? Its confirmed that it runs games around 1440-1800P which is a pretty high standard for average PC gamers.

Who cares about UHD player?  its a console for gaming, i much rather take the low price than useless stuff like this. PS4 Pro will also record gameplay in 1080p 30fps if you dont own a capture card another thing more usefull as a gamer.

Trunkin said:
This reads like a paid promotion...

i thought Sony is broke?



Im very impressed with the Pro personally. 4K and souped up 1080p for that price is fantastic.



I predict that the Wii U will sell a total of 18 million units in its lifetime. 

The NX will be a 900p machine