Fallout 4 looked like crap in PS4. Even in PCs (before mods) it looks meh. Yet; yet; it made $750 million in launch day. People wants to play it regardless of quality. Its existence alone makes a landmark.

Go back and play an open world game circa 2007.  Fallout 4 looks like a late 7/early 8th gen game.  It looks nothing like, say, Oblivion

Oh I'm sorry, I should have specified 1) home consoles and 2) support that means something (Wheelspin? xD) :P

But I did specify post NES.

Meh. I thought the sequel, which came out on the 3DS, was much better.

As if any of their games would sell decent on a Nintendo platform

It's probably because NX is like a souped up PS3/Wii U in terms of horsepower. That's basically what the Tegra X1 is.

Developers are going to have to decide whether or not they want to do the work at that low of a power envelope.

Some devs will say yes, others will say no.

From the sounds of it, NX is something like double a PS3/360 in raw power probably with a lot more RAM and a much more modern architecture.

So PS4/XB1 ports are probably possible if assets/resolution are scaled back (same way Far Cry 4 and MGSV are able to run on PS3/360).

Anyone surprised about this polite no?

Too early to say when it releases in 7 months = no, but just in case it sells a bazillion units, we won't slam the door completely shut.

I'm not sure if you're joking with this or not but Skyrim could hardly run on the PS3 and Fallout 4 had its last gen versions cancelled, thankfully, because there is no way in hell they had enough RAM.  It's a big open world with an absolutely massive number of objects.

maybe the real question is why do people bother asking these questions in the first place? the answer is gonna be the same