Bandorr said:
Seventizz said:
No it didn't. It started on PC and was ported to PS1 & Sega Saturn. TR2 and 3 were paid exclusives for Sony consoles.
Sony has nothing more than money to do with the franchise.
|
Any sources pointing to Sony paying for the console exclusives of TR and TR3?
The only thing I've found is ""Given the worldwide domination of the PlayStation system, it's a natural for Eidos to partner with Sony Computer Entertainment America and Sony Computer Entertainment Europe," said Mike McGarvey, chief operating officer, Eidos Interactive. "We want our best-selling franchise to reach the greatest number of consumers and the PlayStation and its powerful CD-ROM software format satisfies this demand."
Which is very far from "paid exclusive".
|
Um, your very own quote says they signed a deal with Sony. How else can one define a moneyhat?
Source
Link, if that source link doesn't work: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Sony+Computer+Entertainment+America+Signs+Exclusive+Deal+with+Eidos...-a019760956 (this is all a quick Google search would bring up, not going to waste time looking for more)
It was a moneyhat deal. It took a franchise that already existed and kept it off other consoles. Same type of deal like Dead Rising 3, which was called a moneyhat. Or Titanfall, which was called a moneyhat. Or Rise of the Tomb Raider, which was called a moneyhat. Or SFV, which was called a moneyhat.
IIRC it wasn't the only exclusive deal Sony signed for Tomb Raider. After the first three or four games I guess the moneyhat deal was done because I remember Game Boy and Dreamcast TR games. But the first game on PS2, they did a deal to make it PS2 exclusive.
So Tomb Raider doing timed/complete exclusive moneyhat deals is nothing new for the franchise. This is just the first time Playstation gamers have been the ones who had to wait.