Lawlight said:
Nautilus said:
And why would it be a bad metric?I mean, as seen in numerous videos and peoples accounts, the line to play Zelda at E3 was gigantic, sometimes it took a day to play the game, and it had Nintendo whole booth just dedicated to it.And IGN already said its game of the E3 for them.Not aware if it is by other sites.So it obviosly gathered attention, and the data all but points in that way.So why would it be a bad metric?Do you have some evidence that points otherwise?
|
Because, for example, obviously people aren't more interested in Zelda than FIFA 17. So, it's a bad metric.
|
Wait, you are confusing things.Zelda is the game that gathered the most interest in this E3.And thats it.Fifa didnt get more interest than it during that period of time.And you confuse interest with sale.That data means the industry as a whole is more interested in that game than Fifa.It dosent mean that Zelda will sell more or less.It just means that people are interested in it, not that they mean to buy it.The same can be said for VR.Alot of people are interested in VR, and all news sites and publishers keep making either articles or games in VR.Its hype is big.But does it mean it will sell Wii-levels?Of course not.Because people are only interested in it.To buy it there is other factors, such as price, date when it is released, other games that are released in the same timeframe, and so on.
To make a resume, interest is different than intent to buy.We are only gaugin the interest, which is only one of the factors that go into a person intention to buy a game.Thats what that data means.