By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - The Wii does not = , > the PS2,PS3,360 because they are NOT THE SAME!!

HappySqurriel on 29 March 2008
jimmay said:
HappySqurriel said:
jimmay said:
Still waiting for a link to a RESPECTED independent website that proves that the wiimote is more accurate than dual anolog instead of people stamping their feet and repeating their opinions over and over again.

We've played this game before ... The only review you could find where the Wiimote was considered worse than dual analogue was Red Steel, in games like Resident Evil 4: Wii Edition there are quotes like " ... you'll discover the strengths of the new scheme and why, ultimately, the new Wii controls are superior." and "... Using the Wii remote, you can point at the screen and aim with a higher level of accuracy and speed than was previously possible." and " the extra speed and accuracy count for a lot. Birds that flew away before you could cap them in the GCN build will be a breeze to shoot dead in the Wii game. Headshots will come more naturally. Targeting legs and arms won't pose a problem. You will with very little practice be able to walk through environments with the analog stick, all the while setting up your next shot with pinpoint accuracy using the Wii remote. It's an undeniable improvement in control and one that helps you play better. " (IGN http://wii.ign.com/articles/797/797837p2.html )

 


No red steel wasnt the only game i could find, you said i couldnt even find one game that shows the wiimote having worse controls than dual analog and 30 seconds later after i did i quick search i found a review that said so. Resident evil 4 doesn't prove anything. The game was designed to be slow and you couldn't move your cursor around quickly not because the dual analog setup was incapable of doing that, it was deliberatly setup that way to make the game more scary.


http://wii.ign.com/articles/773/773509p1.html

"..."

"Blackhand Edition features over 25 unique motion controls, allowing you to pair up the nunchuk and Wii remote to deliver jabs, crosses, uppercuts, and power hits when fighting, IR aiming in both lock-on and free aim mode, and a ton of context sensitive grapple moves. It doesn't change the game by leaps and bounds, but after playing it on Wii I really can't see people wanting to go back to the traditional controls."

"..."

"When using firearms, players can either lock on and use the Wii IR to aim for specific areas (something that works relatively well, aside from a few non-fluid moves here and there), or press the "+" button and go into a total free-aim mode. Free-aim can be tweaked for sensitivity, and while this works great for making distance shots or quickly spinning to hit larger targets, it's often easier just to lock on rather than lining up a precise shot. Still, the option is there, and it's definitely a step above the dual analog option in the other versions."

http://wii.ign.com/articles/833/833766p3.html

"We've all become so focused on the next big leap in graphics that we sometimes forget that very few innovations have been introduced to home console-based first-person shooter control. For as good as the console version of Call of Duty 4 looks, the controls in Medal of Honor Heroes 2 absolutely spank it "

 



Around the Network
jimmay on 29 March 2008
Gnizmo said:
jimmay said:
Still waiting for a link to a RESPECTED independent website that proves that the wiimote is more accurate than dual anolog instead of people stamping their feet and repeating their opinions over and over again. Their's nothing wrong with the setup of any of the t.v.'s or wii's i've played on and no i don't 'suck' at games because i used to be a pro gamer and in most games i play if their is some kind of leaderboard im normally near the top of it.

And I am waiting for your link to a respected website that says dual-analog is better than wiimote. I guess we will both be waiting a while.


If it's so obvious that the wiimote is more accurate then their should be no trouble in finding conclusive proof and posting it...



FJ-Warez on 29 March 2008
jimmay said:
FJ-Warez said:
jimmay said:
Still waiting for a link to a RESPECTED independent website that proves that the wiimote is more accurate than dual anolog instead of people stamping their feet and repeating their opinions over and over again. Their's nothing wrong with the setup of any of the t.v.'s or wii's i've played on and no i don't 'suck' at games because i used to be a pro gamer and in most games i play if their is some kind of leaderboard im normally near the top of it.

" Samus controls better in Prime 3 than she ever has before. In fact, the heroine's tight maneuverability and speed nurture a level of accuracy never before possible in a console-based first-person experience."

http://wii.ign.com/articles/803/803978p1.html


*smashes head against brick wall*

no i'm talking about in one instance with one game that can't be directly compared with anything, i am talking overall, i'm talking about scientific tests where a respected indepentent website makes identical movements will the wiimote and dual analog sticks and measures the amount of time it takes for movement. And incase you haven't noticed ign is split upto into sections for each console and the people that run each section are fanboys of said console.


Lol, if you can't offer other prove than your opinion all of this is pointless...



By me:

Made with Blender + LuxRender
"Since you can´t understand ... there is no point to taking you seriously."
jimmay on 29 March 2008
FishyJoe said:
jimmay said:
Still waiting for a link to a RESPECTED independent website that proves that the wiimote is more accurate than dual anolog instead of people stamping their feet and repeating their opinions over and over again. Their's nothing wrong with the setup of any of the t.v.'s or wii's i've played on and no i don't 'suck' at games because i used to be a pro gamer and in most games i play if their is some kind of leaderboard im normally near the top of it.

 

Did you wait for some magazine to tell you dual analog was more accurate than keyboards/mouse before you would play on a console?


Whoever said dual analog was more accurate than keyboards/mouse? Mouse/keyboard is the most accurate followed by dual analog and the wiimote is last.



Gnizmo on 29 March 2008
jimmay said:

*smashes head against brick wall*

no i'm talking about in one instance with one game that can't be directly compared with anything, i am talking overall, i'm talking about scientific tests where a respected indepentent website makes identical movements will the wiimote and dual analog sticks and measures the amount of time it takes for movement. And incase you haven't noticed ign is split upto into sections for each console and the people that run each section are fanboys of said console.


He has a ton more evidence than you do right now. Do you have any proof of your claim at all? Can you back it up with anything other than your opinion? If we are in a debate of opinions then you should probably trust the majority. Currently you are the only one claiming the dual-analog is better.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

Around the Network
dsoverpsp on 29 March 2008

the FACT is that dual analog is much harder to control than using a mouse or pointer - it's much harder to move diagonally
-slower to move from one end of screen to other
-mouse/pointer is much more direct (more freedom to move)



Shinsekai on 29 March 2008

Ehh why people can't get this thread over -.-



-Universe aeons ago.

sc94597 on 29 March 2008

@Jimmay You are a funny person. I tried console fps' on my 360, and couldn't stand it. I had to sell CoD 4 , and get a pc version. At least I could stand the wiis controls, and in some ways they are better than pc controls.



Gnizmo on 29 March 2008
jimmay said:
Gnizmo said:
jimmay said:
Still waiting for a link to a RESPECTED independent website that proves that the wiimote is more accurate than dual anolog instead of people stamping their feet and repeating their opinions over and over again. Their's nothing wrong with the setup of any of the t.v.'s or wii's i've played on and no i don't 'suck' at games because i used to be a pro gamer and in most games i play if their is some kind of leaderboard im normally near the top of it.

And I am waiting for your link to a respected website that says dual-analog is better than wiimote. I guess we will both be waiting a while.


If it's so obvious that the wiimote is more accurate then their should be no trouble in finding conclusive proof and posting it...


If it's so obvious that dual-analog is more accurate then their should be no trouble in finding conclusive proof and posting it...

See what I did there?



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

FJ-Warez on 29 March 2008

Well, then this is set, unless jimmay offers us a prove, a link to a respected independent website that tested and showed how the dual analog is better than the wiimote in accuracy and speed, we can let this thread die...

We can wait for that link, but is not going to happend... XD



By me:

Made with Blender + LuxRender
"Since you can´t understand ... there is no point to taking you seriously."