Baalzamon said:
LudicrousSpeed said: Instead of directing anger at a little kid and a mother, how about the zoo? Why is a 4 year old able to get into this I enclosure? |
This is wrong in sooooooo many aspects. We have become a society that literally always needs to put the burden/blame on somebody else.
There is a reason there are less than a handful of cases of children falling into a gorilla exhibit like this in the last 50 years. The zoo clearly does not need to be doing anything more to prevent this, as their current method has only allowed something to happen a couple of times in recent history.
|
It only takes one time of something happening to know that it needs to change. You're saying a design that only allows a child to fall in "a couple times in recent history" is good enough... I'm simply saying as a business that accepts money from people to display dangerous animals, that business should do as good a job as possible making sure those people are safe. For me, a child falling into a dangerous animals enclosure "a couple times in recent history" is "a couple times" too much.
I mean, it's a four year old kid. How can they have such bad design that a four year old can fall in? Even the fake ponds on my local amusement park with shallow water where you pay to drive RC boats has better barriers than that.
No need to say anything about society and putting the blame on someone else. I'm putting the blame right where it belongs. And you know what? The fact that they blew the gorilla away before it had a chance to do anything to the kid proves me right. And when "gorilla world" reopens, they'll have their shit together.