Psychotic on 31 May 2016
| archbrix said: 1. Way to generalize... and exaggerate. 2. Few are arguing against human life being paramount. It's the human negligence that we have a problem with that needlessly resulted in an ENDANGERED SPECIES being killed. 3. Now this I can somewhat agree with, but again, the situation would have never reached that point if it wasn't for human negligence. |
1. So you do not contest the merit of what I said? Good enough for me.
2. I'll give you that one. It didn't occur to me that people value individuals of endangered species more. Because, you know, from the moral perspective it doesn't really matter... but yeah, I concede that point.
3. *Supposed* negligence.
