Leadified said:
Of course, there's flexibility in every topic to a certain degree and this warning isn't here to prevent discussion about the credibility of Emily Rogers. However so far in your discussion you have provided no evidence to back up your arguments other than, "He writes like a man on twitter" and "I call it now, it's a sausage.". If you're going to take this thread in a new direction then at least provide some concerte evidence to justify it instead of conjecture. |
But there wouldn't be much discussion on these forums if we'd be required to back up everything with hard evidence. That's not how we function as human beings, like we're in front of some court.
Now that I have a moderator after me I'd like to drop it here.